Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)
RL leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though LNT is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Alliant Energy Corporation and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
$73.11Utilities
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
$403.98Consumer Cyclical
Total return — LNT vs RL
growth of $100 · last 29yLNT +426.7%RL +1182.5%RL compounded faster
LNT RL
LNT vs RL: by the numbers
- •RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $18.88B market cap).
- •LNT trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.92 vs 26.74 P/E).
- •LNT converts more revenue to profit (18.58% vs 11.60% net margin).
- •RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 5.38% CAGR).
- •LNT pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 0.90%).
Which is better, LNT or RL?
Metric tally: LNT 7 · RL 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLNT(lower P/E)
GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLNT(higher dividend yield)
QualityRL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LNT | RL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 22.92● | 26.74 |
| Forward P/E | 19.85● | 22.03 |
| P/S ratio | 4.28 | 3.10● |
| P/B ratio | 2.55● | 8.86 |
| PEG ratio | 1.21 | 0.71● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.94● | 22.22 |
| FCF yield | — | 2.96% |
Profitability
| Metric | LNT | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.97% | 69.87%● |
| Operating margin | 23.01%● | 14.53% |
| Net margin | 18.58%● | 11.60% |
| ROE | 11.06% | 33.13%● |
| ROIC | 4.12% | 19.62%● |
Dividends
| Metric | LNT | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.85%● | 0.90% |
| Payout ratio | 66.19% | 23.67% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LNT | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.38% | 13.01%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.98% | 20.37%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.57% | 22.25%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | 29.56%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LNT or RL?
- It depends on your goal. value: LNT (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LNT (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 9 to 7.
- Is LNT or RL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LNT is cheaper: LNT trades at a 22.92 P/E and RL at 26.74.
- Which has grown faster, LNT or RL?
- Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — LNT at a 5.38% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
- Does LNT or RL pay a bigger dividend?
- LNT yields 2.85% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LNT or RL more profitable?
- LNT runs the higher net margin — LNT at 18.58% versus RL at 11.60%.
- Which has been the better investment, LNT or RL?
- Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — LNT at 9.86% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Alliant Energy P/E ratioRalph Lauren P/E ratioAlliant Energy dividend yieldRalph Lauren dividend yieldAlliant Energy ROERalph Lauren ROEAlliant Energy operating marginRalph Lauren operating marginAlliant Energy revenue growthRalph Lauren revenue growthAlliant Energy free cash flowRalph Lauren free cash flow
Alliant Energy & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.