Is LIN or NTR cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NTR is cheaper: LIN trades at a 34.41 P/E and NTR at 13.34.

Which has grown faster, LIN or NTR?

Over the past five years, NTR grew revenue faster — LIN at a 4.55% CAGR versus NTR at 5.38%.

Does LIN or NTR pay a bigger dividend?

LIN yields 1.20% and NTR yields 3.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LIN or NTR more profitable?

LIN runs the higher net margin — LIN at 20.56% versus NTR at 8.58%.

Which has been the better investment, LIN or NTR?

Over the past 5-year, LIN delivered the higher annualized total return — LIN at 18.48% versus NTR at 4.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Linde plc (LIN) vs Nutrien Ltd. (NTR)

NTR leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Linde plc and Nutrien Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LIN

Linde plc

$238.88B

$518.17Basic Materials

NTR

Nutrien Ltd.

$31.51B

$65.48Basic Materials

Total return — LIN vs NTR

growth of $100 · last 8y

LIN +237.1%NTR +19.6%LIN compounded faster

LIN NTR

LIN vs NTR: by the numbers

•LIN is the larger company ($238.88B vs $31.51B market cap).
•NTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.34 vs 34.41 P/E).
•LIN converts more revenue to profit (20.56% vs 8.58% net margin).
•NTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.38% vs 4.55% CAGR).
•NTR pays the higher dividend yield (3.34% vs 1.20%).

Which is better, LIN or NTR?

Metric tally: LIN 7 · NTR 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNTR(lower P/E)

GrowthNTR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeNTR(higher dividend yield)

QualityLIN(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LIN	NTR
P/E ratio	34.41	13.34●
Forward P/E	26.44	12.40●
P/S ratio	6.97	1.13●
P/B ratio	6.27	1.25●
PEG ratio	4.12	0.05●
EV / EBITDA	19.91	7.09●
FCF yield	2.11%	7.07%●

Profitability

Metric	LIN	NTR
Gross margin	45.99%●	31.16%
Operating margin	28.79%●	14.15%
Net margin	20.56%●	8.58%
ROE	18.47%●	9.46%
ROIC	8.97%●	6.79%

Dividends

Metric	LIN	NTR
Dividend yield	1.20%	3.34%●
Payout ratio	42.26%	46.10%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LIN	NTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.55%	5.38%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	25.30%	41.02%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	1.07%●	0.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.97%●	4.60%

Frequently asked

Which is better, LIN or NTR?: It depends on your goal. value: NTR (lower P/E); growth: NTR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTR (higher dividend yield); quality: LIN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTR leads 10 to 7.
Is LIN or NTR cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NTR is cheaper: LIN trades at a 34.41 P/E and NTR at 13.34.
Which has grown faster, LIN or NTR?: Over the past five years, NTR grew revenue faster — LIN at a 4.55% CAGR versus NTR at 5.38%.
Does LIN or NTR pay a bigger dividend?: LIN yields 1.20% and NTR yields 3.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LIN or NTR more profitable?: LIN runs the higher net margin — LIN at 20.56% versus NTR at 8.58%.
Which has been the better investment, LIN or NTR?: Over the past 5-year, LIN delivered the higher annualized total return — LIN at 18.48% versus NTR at 4.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LIN analysis Full NTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Linde P/E ratio Nutrien P/E ratio Linde dividend yield Nutrien dividend yield Linde ROE Nutrien ROE Linde operating margin Nutrien operating margin Linde revenue growth Nutrien revenue growth Linde free cash flow Nutrien free cash flow

Linde & Nutrien appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.