Lennox International Inc. (LII) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)
SNA leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Lennox International Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LII
Lennox International Inc.
$570.69Industrials
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
$400.95Industrials
Total return — LII vs SNA
growth of $100 · last 27yLII +2943.7%SNA +1025.3%LII compounded faster
LII SNA
LII vs SNA: by the numbers
- •SNA is the larger company ($20.77B vs $19.86B market cap).
- •SNA trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.71 vs 25.71 P/E).
- •SNA converts more revenue to profit (19.99% vs 14.89% net margin).
- •LII grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.48% vs 5.87% CAGR).
- •SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.36% vs 0.91%).
Which is better, LII or SNA?
Metric tally: LII 7 · SNA 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSNA(lower P/E)
GrowthLII(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSNA(higher dividend yield)
QualityLII(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LII | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.71 | 20.71● |
| Forward P/E | 21.44 | 20.98● |
| P/S ratio | 3.80● | 4.13 |
| P/B ratio | 16.45 | 3.55● |
| PEG ratio | 1.34● | 1.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.85 | 13.82● |
| FCF yield | 3.31% | 5.10%● |
Profitability
| Metric | LII | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.06% | 51.30%● |
| Operating margin | 19.52% | 24.71%● |
| Net margin | 14.89% | 19.99%● |
| ROE | 64.51%● | 17.18% |
| ROIC | 25.51%● | 13.79% |
Dividends
| Metric | LII | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 2.36%● |
| Payout ratio | 23.31% | 48.46% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LII | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.48%● | 5.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 19.13%● | 11.05% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 1.44%● | 0.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.85% | 15.53%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LII or SNA?
- It depends on your goal. value: SNA (lower P/E); growth: LII (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SNA (higher dividend yield); quality: LII (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SNA leads 10 to 7.
- Is LII or SNA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper: LII trades at a 25.71 P/E and SNA at 20.71.
- Which has grown faster, LII or SNA?
- Over the past five years, LII grew revenue faster — LII at a 6.48% CAGR versus SNA at 5.87%.
- Does LII or SNA pay a bigger dividend?
- LII yields 0.91% and SNA yields 2.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LII or SNA more profitable?
- SNA runs the higher net margin — LII at 14.89% versus SNA at 19.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, LII or SNA?
- Over the past 10-year, LII delivered the higher annualized total return — LII at 16.43% versus SNA at 13.03%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lennox International P/E ratioSnap-on P/E ratioLennox International dividend yieldSnap-on dividend yieldLennox International ROESnap-on ROELennox International operating marginSnap-on operating marginLennox International revenue growthSnap-on revenue growthLennox International free cash flowSnap-on free cash flow
Lennox International & Snap-on appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.