Is LII or RL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LII is cheaper: LII trades at a 23.80 P/E and RL at 26.92.

Which has grown faster, LII or RL?

Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — LII at a 6.48% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.

Does LII or RL pay a bigger dividend?

LII yields 0.98% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LII or RL more profitable?

LII runs the higher net margin — LII at 14.89% versus RL at 11.60%.

Which has been the better investment, LII or RL?

Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — LII at 15.99% versus RL at 17.96%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lennox International Inc. (LII) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

LII leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lennox International Inc. and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LII

Lennox International Inc.

$18.39B

$528.33Industrials

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$25.01B

$406.75Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LII vs RL

growth of $100 · last 27y

LII +2717.8%RL +2008.2%LII compounded faster

LII RL

LII vs RL: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($25.01B vs $18.39B market cap).
•LII trades at the lower earnings multiple (23.80 vs 26.92 P/E).
•LII converts more revenue to profit (14.89% vs 11.60% net margin).
•RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 6.48% CAGR).
•LII pays the higher dividend yield (0.98% vs 0.90%).

Which is better, LII or RL?

Metric tally: LII 9 · RL 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLII(lower P/E)

GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeLII(higher dividend yield)

QualityLII(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LII	RL
P/E ratio	23.80●	26.92
Forward P/E	19.85●	22.18
P/S ratio	3.52	3.12●
P/B ratio	15.23	8.92●
PEG ratio	1.24	0.71●
EV / EBITDA	17.57●	18.67
FCF yield	3.57%●	2.94%

Profitability

Metric	LII	RL
Gross margin	33.06%	69.87%●
Operating margin	19.52%●	14.53%
Net margin	14.89%●	11.60%
ROE	64.51%●	33.13%
ROIC	25.51%●	19.62%

Dividends

Metric	LII	RL
Dividend yield	0.98%●	0.90%
Payout ratio	23.31%	23.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LII	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.48%	13.01%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	19.13%	20.37%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	1.44%	22.25%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.28%	31.17%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LII or RL?: It depends on your goal. value: LII (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LII (higher dividend yield); quality: LII (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LII leads 9 to 8.
Is LII or RL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LII is cheaper: LII trades at a 23.80 P/E and RL at 26.92.
Which has grown faster, LII or RL?: Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — LII at a 6.48% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
Does LII or RL pay a bigger dividend?: LII yields 0.98% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LII or RL more profitable?: LII runs the higher net margin — LII at 14.89% versus RL at 11.60%.
Which has been the better investment, LII or RL?: Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — LII at 15.99% versus RL at 17.96%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LII analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lennox International P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio Lennox International dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield Lennox International ROE Ralph Lauren ROE Lennox International operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin Lennox International revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth Lennox International free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

Lennox International & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.