Lennox International Inc. (LII) vs Masco Corporation (MAS)
MAS leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Lennox International Inc. and Masco Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LII
Lennox International Inc.
$533.58IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MAS
Masco Corporation
$77.51IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
Total return — LII vs MAS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 27yLII +4391.0%MAS +423.0%LII compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LII MAS
LII vs MAS: by the numbers
- •LII is the larger company ($18.57B vs $15.64B market cap).
- •MAS trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.52 vs 24.04 P/E).
- •LII converts more revenue to profit (14.89% vs 10.90% net margin).
- •LII grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.48% vs 0.27% CAGR).
- •MAS pays the higher dividend yield (1.60% vs 0.99%).
Which is better, LII or MAS?
Metric tally: LII 7 · MAS 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMAS(lower P/E)
GrowthLII(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMAS(higher dividend yield)
QualityMAS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LII | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.04 | 19.52● |
| Forward P/E | 21.87 | 18.37● |
| P/S ratio | 3.55 | 2.08● |
| P/B ratio | 15.38 | — |
| PEG ratio | 1.26● | 5.61 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.63 | 13.10● |
| FCF yield | 3.54% | 5.91%● |
Profitability
| Metric | LII | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.06% | 35.41%● |
| Operating margin | 19.52%● | 16.79% |
| Net margin | 14.89%● | 10.90% |
| ROE | 64.51%● | -435.48% |
| ROIC | 25.51% | 26.15%● |
Dividends
| Metric | LII | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 1.60%● |
| Payout ratio | 23.58% | 32.47% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LII | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.48%● | 0.27% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 19.13%● | 5.07% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 1.44% | 2.44%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.70%● | 7.55% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LII or MAS?
- It depends on your goal. value: MAS (lower P/E); growth: LII (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MAS (higher dividend yield); quality: MAS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MAS leads 9 to 7.
- Is LII or MAS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MAS is cheaper: LII trades at a 24.04 P/E and MAS at 19.52.
- Which has grown faster, LII or MAS?
- Over the past five years, LII grew revenue faster — LII at a 6.48% CAGR versus MAS at 0.27%.
- Does LII or MAS pay a bigger dividend?
- LII yields 0.99% and MAS yields 1.60% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LII or MAS more profitable?
- LII runs the higher net margin — LII at 14.89% versus MAS at 10.90%.
- Which has been the better investment, LII or MAS?
- Over the past 10-year, LII delivered the higher annualized total return — LII at 14.79% versus MAS at 10.16%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lennox International P/E ratioMasco P/E ratioLennox International dividend yieldMasco dividend yieldLennox International ROEMasco ROELennox International operating marginMasco operating marginLennox International revenue growthMasco revenue growthLennox International free cash flowMasco free cash flow
Lennox International & Masco appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.