Lennar Corporation (LEN) vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM)
WSM leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics, though LEN is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Lennar Corporation and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LEN
Lennar Corporation
$93.52Consumer Cyclical
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
$239.19Consumer Cyclical
Total return — LEN vs WSM
growth of $100 · last 30yLEN +1495.9%WSM +8008.1%WSM compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LEN WSM
LEN vs WSM: by the numbers
- •WSM is the larger company ($28.14B vs $23.22B market cap).
- •LEN trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.64 vs 26.78 P/E).
- •WSM converts more revenue to profit (13.81% vs 4.94% net margin).
- •LEN grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.01% vs 1.55% CAGR).
- •LEN pays the higher dividend yield (2.14% vs 1.27%).
Which is better, LEN or WSM?
Metric tally: LEN 7 · WSM 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLEN(lower P/E)
GrowthLEN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLEN(higher dividend yield)
QualityWSM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LEN | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.64● | 26.78 |
| Forward P/E | 16.59● | 27.47 |
| P/S ratio | 0.69● | 3.64 |
| P/B ratio | 1.05● | 15.34 |
| PEG ratio | 58.54 | 42.57● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.06● | 16.24 |
| FCF yield | 0.06% | 3.82%● |
Profitability
| Metric | LEN | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 7.95% | 46.06%● |
| Operating margin | 6.02% | 17.97%● |
| Net margin | 4.94% | 13.81%● |
| ROE | 7.49% | 58.22%● |
| ROIC | 6.62% | 28.83%● |
Dividends
| Metric | LEN | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.14%● | 1.27% |
| Payout ratio | 25.06% | 33.93% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LEN | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.01%● | 1.55% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.25% | 15.25%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -67.59% | -3.21%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.75% | 26.98%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LEN or WSM?
- It depends on your goal. value: LEN (lower P/E); growth: LEN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LEN (higher dividend yield); quality: WSM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WSM leads 10 to 7.
- Is LEN or WSM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LEN is cheaper: LEN trades at a 14.64 P/E and WSM at 26.78.
- Which has grown faster, LEN or WSM?
- Over the past five years, LEN grew revenue faster — LEN at a 6.01% CAGR versus WSM at 1.55%.
- Does LEN or WSM pay a bigger dividend?
- LEN yields 2.14% and WSM yields 1.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LEN or WSM more profitable?
- WSM runs the higher net margin — LEN at 4.94% versus WSM at 13.81%.
- Which has been the better investment, LEN or WSM?
- Over the past 10-year, WSM delivered the higher annualized total return — LEN at 8.74% versus WSM at 27.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lennar P/E ratioWilliams-Sonoma P/E ratioLennar dividend yieldWilliams-Sonoma dividend yieldLennar ROEWilliams-Sonoma ROELennar operating marginWilliams-Sonoma operating marginLennar revenue growthWilliams-Sonoma revenue growthLennar free cash flowWilliams-Sonoma free cash flow
Lennar & Williams-Sonoma appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.