Lennar Corporation (LEN) vs Smurfit Westrock plc (SW)
SW leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though LEN is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Lennar Corporation and Smurfit Westrock plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 7, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LEN
Lennar Corporation
$86.89Consumer Cyclical
SW
Smurfit Westrock plc
$45.13Consumer Cyclical
Total return — LEN vs SW
growth of $100 · last 18yLEN +473.6%SW +460.0%LEN compounded faster
LEN SW
LEN vs SW: by the numbers
- •SW is the larger company ($23.67B vs $21.57B market cap).
- •LEN trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.72 vs 63.71 P/E).
- •LEN converts more revenue to profit (4.94% vs 1.23% net margin).
- •SW grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.07% vs 6.01% CAGR).
- •SW pays the higher dividend yield (3.96% vs 2.28%).
Which is better, LEN or SW?
Metric tally: LEN 8 · SW 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLEN(lower P/E)
GrowthSW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSW(higher dividend yield)
QualityLEN(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LEN | SW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.72● | 63.71 |
| Forward P/E | 15.55● | 19.74 |
| P/S ratio | 0.65● | 0.81 |
| P/B ratio | 0.98● | 1.36 |
| PEG ratio | 54.87 | 0.43● |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.38 | 8.55● |
| FCF yield | 3.86% | 4.15%● |
Profitability
| Metric | LEN | SW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 7.95% | 18.42%● |
| Operating margin | 6.02% | 6.24%● |
| Net margin | 4.94%● | 1.23% |
| ROE | 7.49%● | 2.06% |
| ROIC | 6.62%● | 3.59% |
Dividends
| Metric | LEN | SW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 3.96%● |
| Payout ratio | 25.06% | 135.01% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LEN | SW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.01% | 24.07%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.25%● | -16.43% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -25.28% | -3.68%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.44% | 1.40%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LEN or SW?
- It depends on your goal. value: LEN (lower P/E); growth: SW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SW (higher dividend yield); quality: LEN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SW leads 9 to 8.
- Is LEN or SW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LEN is cheaper: LEN trades at a 13.72 P/E and SW at 63.71.
- Which has grown faster, LEN or SW?
- Over the past five years, SW grew revenue faster — LEN at a 6.01% CAGR versus SW at 24.07%.
- Does LEN or SW pay a bigger dividend?
- LEN yields 2.28% and SW yields 3.96% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LEN or SW more profitable?
- LEN runs the higher net margin — LEN at 4.94% versus SW at 1.23%.
- Which has been the better investment, LEN or SW?
- Over the past 10-year, LEN delivered the higher annualized total return — LEN at 7.47% versus SW at 5.57%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lennar P/E ratioSmurfit Westrock P/E ratioLennar dividend yieldSmurfit Westrock dividend yieldLennar ROESmurfit Westrock ROELennar operating marginSmurfit Westrock operating marginLennar revenue growthSmurfit Westrock revenue growthLennar free cash flowSmurfit Westrock free cash flow
Lennar & Smurfit Westrock appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 7, 2026.