Is LEN or SN cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LEN is cheaper: LEN trades at a 14.64 P/E and SN at 28.80.

Which has grown faster, LEN or SN?

Over the past five years, SN grew revenue faster — LEN at a 6.01% CAGR versus SN at 18.38%.

Does LEN or SN pay a bigger dividend?

LEN pays a dividend (2.14% yield) while SN does not currently pay one.

Is LEN or SN more profitable?

SN runs the higher net margin — LEN at 4.94% versus SN at 10.70%.

Lennar Corporation (LEN) vs SharkNinja, Inc. (SN)

SN leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics, though LEN is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Lennar Corporation and SharkNinja, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LEN

Lennar Corporation

$23.22B

$93.52Consumer Cyclical

SharkNinja, Inc.

$20.49B

$142.85Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LEN vs SN

growth of $100 · last 3y

LEN -26.8%SN +242.1%SN compounded faster

LEN SN

LEN vs SN: by the numbers

•LEN is the larger company ($23.22B vs $20.49B market cap).
•LEN trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.64 vs 28.80 P/E).
•SN converts more revenue to profit (10.70% vs 4.94% net margin).
•SN grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.38% vs 6.01% CAGR).
•LEN pays a dividend (2.14% yield) while SN does not currently pay one.

Which is better, LEN or SN?

Metric tally: LEN 5 · SN 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLEN(lower P/E)

GrowthSN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualitySN(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LEN	SN
P/E ratio	14.64●	28.80
Forward P/E	16.59●	20.41
P/S ratio	0.69●	3.09
P/B ratio	1.05●	7.36
PEG ratio	58.54	0.39●
EV / EBITDA	13.06●	18.93
FCF yield	0.06%	1.86%●

Profitability

Metric	LEN	SN
Gross margin	7.95%	48.71%●
Operating margin	6.02%	14.37%●
Net margin	4.94%	10.70%●
ROE	7.49%	25.51%●
ROIC	6.62%	19.72%●

Dividends

Metric	LEN	SN
Dividend yield	2.14%	—
Payout ratio	25.06%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LEN	SN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.01%	18.38%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.25%	16.16%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-67.59%	15.34%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	0.75%	—

Frequently asked

Which is better, LEN or SN?: It depends on your goal. value: LEN (lower P/E); growth: SN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SN leads 10 to 5.
Is LEN or SN cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LEN is cheaper: LEN trades at a 14.64 P/E and SN at 28.80.
Which has grown faster, LEN or SN?: Over the past five years, SN grew revenue faster — LEN at a 6.01% CAGR versus SN at 18.38%.
Does LEN or SN pay a bigger dividend?: LEN pays a dividend (2.14% yield) while SN does not currently pay one.
Is LEN or SN more profitable?: SN runs the higher net margin — LEN at 4.94% versus SN at 10.70%.

Go deeper

Full LEN analysis Full SN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lennar P/E ratio SharkNinja P/E ratio Lennar dividend yield SharkNinja dividend yield Lennar ROE SharkNinja ROE Lennar operating margin SharkNinja operating margin Lennar revenue growth SharkNinja revenue growth Lennar free cash flow SharkNinja free cash flow

Lennar & SharkNinja appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.