Lennar Corporation (LEN) vs Rollins, Inc. (ROL)
ROL leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics, though LEN is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Lennar Corporation and Rollins, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — LEN vs ROL
growth of $100 · last 30yLEN +1495.9%ROL +3118.7%ROL compounded faster
LEN ROL
LEN vs ROL: by the numbers
- •LEN is the larger company ($23.22B vs $20.77B market cap).
- •LEN trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.64 vs 39.27 P/E).
- •ROL converts more revenue to profit (13.77% vs 4.94% net margin).
- •ROL grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.73% vs 6.01% CAGR).
- •LEN pays the higher dividend yield (2.14% vs 1.71%).
Which is better, LEN or ROL?
Metric tally: LEN 6 · ROL 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLEN(lower P/E)
GrowthROL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLEN(higher dividend yield)
QualityROL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LEN | ROL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.64● | 39.27 |
| Forward P/E | 16.59● | 30.97 |
| P/S ratio | 0.69● | 5.36 |
| P/B ratio | 1.05● | 14.91 |
| PEG ratio | 58.54 | 4.07● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.06● | 25.12 |
| FCF yield | 0.06% | 3.01%● |
Profitability
| Metric | LEN | ROL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 7.95% | 51.78%● |
| Operating margin | 6.02% | 18.99%● |
| Net margin | 4.94% | 13.77%● |
| ROE | 7.49% | 38.31%● |
| ROIC | 6.62% | 20.95%● |
Dividends
| Metric | LEN | ROL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.14%● | 1.71% |
| Payout ratio | 25.06% | 66.97% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LEN | ROL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.01% | 11.73%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.25% | 15.08%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -67.59% | 7.19%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.75% | 6.21%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LEN or ROL?
- It depends on your goal. value: LEN (lower P/E); growth: ROL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LEN (higher dividend yield); quality: ROL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ROL leads 11 to 6.
- Is LEN or ROL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LEN is cheaper: LEN trades at a 14.64 P/E and ROL at 39.27.
- Which has grown faster, LEN or ROL?
- Over the past five years, ROL grew revenue faster — LEN at a 6.01% CAGR versus ROL at 11.73%.
- Does LEN or ROL pay a bigger dividend?
- LEN yields 2.14% and ROL yields 1.71% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LEN or ROL more profitable?
- ROL runs the higher net margin — LEN at 4.94% versus ROL at 13.77%.
- Which has been the better investment, LEN or ROL?
- Over the past 10-year, ROL delivered the higher annualized total return — LEN at 8.74% versus ROL at 14.88%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lennar P/E ratioRollins P/E ratioLennar dividend yieldRollins dividend yieldLennar ROERollins ROELennar operating marginRollins operating marginLennar revenue growthRollins revenue growthLennar free cash flowRollins free cash flow
Lennar & Rollins appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.