Which has grown faster, LDOS or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — LDOS at a 6.37% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.

Does LDOS or WULF pay a bigger dividend?

LDOS pays a dividend (1.69% yield) while WULF does not currently pay one.

Is LDOS or WULF more profitable?

LDOS runs the higher net margin — LDOS at 8.20% versus WULF at -611.46%.

Which has been the better investment, LDOS or WULF?

Over the past 10-year, WULF delivered the higher annualized total return — LDOS at 9.85% versus WULF at 11.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

LDOS leads on 7 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Leidos Holdings, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LDOS

Leidos Holdings, Inc.

Total return — LDOS vs WULF

growth of $100 · last 20y

LDOS +100.2%WULF +224.5%WULF compounded faster

LDOS WULF

LDOS vs WULF: by the numbers

•WULF is the larger company ($12.91B vs $12.58B market cap).
•LDOS is profitable (8.20% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 6.37% CAGR).
•LDOS pays a dividend (1.69% yield) while WULF does not currently pay one.

Which is better, LDOS or WULF?

Metric tally: LDOS 7 · WULF 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWULF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLDOS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LDOS	WULF
P/E ratio	9.16	—
Forward P/E	8.44	—
P/S ratio	0.74●	65.59
P/B ratio	2.55●	73.78
PEG ratio	0.82	—
EV / EBITDA	7.99	—
FCF yield	14.51%	—

Profitability

Metric	LDOS	WULF
Gross margin	17.53%	64.02%●
Operating margin	12.03%●	-147.04%
Net margin	8.20%●	-611.46%
ROE	28.35%●	-470.94%
ROIC	15.00%●	-3.18%

Dividends

Metric	LDOS	WULF
Dividend yield	1.69%	—
Payout ratio	15.06%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LDOS	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.37%	66.83%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	20.47%●	-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	12.40%	26.65%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	0.67%	11.84%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LDOS or WULF?: It depends on your goal. growth: WULF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LDOS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LDOS leads 7 to 4.
Which has grown faster, LDOS or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — LDOS at a 6.37% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
Does LDOS or WULF pay a bigger dividend?: LDOS pays a dividend (1.69% yield) while WULF does not currently pay one.
Is LDOS or WULF more profitable?: LDOS runs the higher net margin — LDOS at 8.20% versus WULF at -611.46%.
Which has been the better investment, LDOS or WULF?: Over the past 10-year, WULF delivered the higher annualized total return — LDOS at 9.85% versus WULF at 11.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LDOS analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Leidos P/E ratio TeraWulf P/E ratio Leidos dividend yield TeraWulf dividend yield Leidos ROE TeraWulf ROE Leidos operating margin TeraWulf operating margin Leidos revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth Leidos free cash flow TeraWulf free cash flow

Leidos & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.