On trailing earnings, L is cheaper: L trades at a 13.77 P/E and RL at 26.74.

Which has grown faster, L or RL?

Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — L at a 5.43% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.

Does L or RL pay a bigger dividend?

L yields 0.23% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is L or RL more profitable?

RL runs the higher net margin — L at 10.22% versus RL at 11.60%.

Which has been the better investment, L or RL?

Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — L at 11.15% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Loews Corporation (L) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

RL leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics, though L is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Loews Corporation and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Loews Corporation

$22.37B

$108.12Financial Services

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$24.64B

$403.98Consumer Cyclical

Total return — L vs RL

growth of $100 · last 29y

L +538.0%RL +1182.5%RL compounded faster

L RL

L vs RL: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $22.37B market cap).
•L trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.77 vs 26.74 P/E).
•RL converts more revenue to profit (11.60% vs 10.22% net margin).
•RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 5.43% CAGR).
•RL pays the higher dividend yield (0.90% vs 0.23%).

Which is better, L or RL?

Metric tally: L 4 · RL 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueL(lower P/E)

GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRL(higher dividend yield)

QualityRL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	L	RL
P/E ratio	13.77●	26.74
Forward P/E	—	22.03
P/S ratio	1.22●	3.10
P/B ratio	1.19●	8.86
PEG ratio	0.55●	0.71
EV / EBITDA	—	22.22
FCF yield	—	2.96%

Profitability

Metric	L	RL
Gross margin	46.05%	69.87%●
Operating margin	12.62%	14.53%●
Net margin	10.22%	11.60%●
ROE	9.99%	33.13%●
ROIC	3.76%	19.62%●

Dividends

Metric	L	RL
Dividend yield	0.23%	0.90%●
Payout ratio	3.14%	23.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	L	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.43%	13.01%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.17%	20.37%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	22.25%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.37%	29.56%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, L or RL?: It depends on your goal. value: L (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RL (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 9 to 4.
Is L or RL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, L is cheaper: L trades at a 13.77 P/E and RL at 26.74.
Which has grown faster, L or RL?: Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — L at a 5.43% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
Does L or RL pay a bigger dividend?: L yields 0.23% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is L or RL more profitable?: RL runs the higher net margin — L at 10.22% versus RL at 11.60%.
Which has been the better investment, L or RL?: Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — L at 11.15% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full L analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Loews P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio Loews dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield Loews ROE Ralph Lauren ROE Loews operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin Loews revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth Loews free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

Loews & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.