Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs Altria Group, Inc. (MO)
MO leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Altria Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$102.29Consumer Defensive
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
$71.94Consumer Defensive
Total return — KMB vs MO
growth of $100 · last 30yKMB +195.9%MO +104.8%KMB compounded faster
KMB MO
KMB vs MO: by the numbers
- •MO is the larger company ($120.13B vs $33.95B market cap).
- •MO trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.05 vs 16.06 P/E).
- •MO converts more revenue to profit (36.91% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •MO grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.08% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •MO pays the higher dividend yield (5.84% vs 4.97%).
Which is better, KMB or MO?
Metric tally: KMB 4 · MO 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMO(lower P/E)
GrowthMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMO(higher dividend yield)
QualityMO(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | MO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.06 | 15.05● |
| Forward P/E | 13.49 | 12.23● |
| P/S ratio | 2.06● | 5.52 |
| P/B ratio | 18.98 | — |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.26 | 11.93● |
| FCF yield | 7.56%● | 7.16% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.86% | 67.84%● |
| Operating margin | 13.27% | 50.73%● |
| Net margin | 12.81% | 36.91%● |
| ROE | 117.98%● | -198.37% |
| ROIC | 17.62% | 42.95%● |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.97% | 5.84%● |
| Payout ratio | 83.55% | 102.19% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.61% | 1.08%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 11.36%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.38%● | 1.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.94% | 16.42%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KMB or MO?
- It depends on your goal. value: MO (lower P/E); growth: MO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MO (higher dividend yield); quality: MO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MO leads 11 to 4.
- Is KMB or MO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MO is cheaper: KMB trades at a 16.06 P/E and MO at 15.05.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or MO?
- Over the past five years, MO grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus MO at 1.08%.
- Does KMB or MO pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 4.97% and MO yields 5.84% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or MO more profitable?
- MO runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus MO at 36.91%.
- Which has been the better investment, KMB or MO?
- Over the past 10-year, MO delivered the higher annualized total return — KMB at 1.05% versus MO at 7.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioAltria P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldAltria dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEAltria ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginAltria operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthAltria revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowAltria free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Altria appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.