Is KMB or MDLZ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: KMB trades at a 16.97 P/E and MDLZ at 30.60.

Which has grown faster, KMB or MDLZ?

Over the past five years, MDLZ grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus MDLZ at 7.71%.

Does KMB or MDLZ pay a bigger dividend?

KMB yields 4.70% and MDLZ yields 3.22% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is KMB or MDLZ more profitable?

KMB runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus MDLZ at 6.64%.

Which has been the better investment, KMB or MDLZ?

Over the past 10-year, MDLZ delivered the higher annualized total return — KMB at 1.60% versus MDLZ at 6.21%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kimberly-Clark Corp (KMB) vs Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ)

KMB leads on 12 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corp and Mondelez International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

KMB

Kimberly-Clark Corp

$35.88B

$108.10Consumer Defensive

MDLZ

Mondelez International, Inc.

$78.56B

$61.20Consumer Defensive

Total return — KMB vs MDLZ

growth of $100 · last 25y

KMB +91.6%MDLZ +199.3%MDLZ compounded faster

KMB MDLZ

KMB vs MDLZ: by the numbers

•MDLZ is the larger company ($78.56B vs $35.88B market cap).
•KMB trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.97 vs 30.60 P/E).
•KMB converts more revenue to profit (12.81% vs 6.64% net margin).
•MDLZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.71% vs -2.61% CAGR).
•KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.70% vs 3.22%).

Which is better, KMB or MDLZ?

Metric tally: KMB 12 · MDLZ 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueKMB(lower P/E)

GrowthMDLZ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)

QualityKMB(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KMB	MDLZ
P/E ratio	16.97●	30.60
Forward P/E	14.27●	18.10
P/S ratio	2.18	2.01●
P/B ratio	20.06	3.07●
EV / EBITDA	13.90●	19.33
FCF yield	7.16%●	3.26%

Profitability

Metric	KMB	MDLZ
Gross margin	35.86%●	28.77%
Operating margin	13.27%●	9.55%
Net margin	12.81%●	6.64%
ROE	117.98%●	10.13%
ROIC	17.41%●	5.13%

Dividends

Metric	KMB	MDLZ
Dividend yield	4.70%●	3.22%
Payout ratio	83.55%	104.23%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KMB	MDLZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-2.61%	7.71%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-2.50%●	-5.29%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	3.38%●	-7.14%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-0.35%	1.97%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, KMB or MDLZ?: It depends on your goal. value: KMB (lower P/E); growth: MDLZ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KMB leads 12 to 4.
Is KMB or MDLZ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: KMB trades at a 16.97 P/E and MDLZ at 30.60.
Which has grown faster, KMB or MDLZ?: Over the past five years, MDLZ grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus MDLZ at 7.71%.
Does KMB or MDLZ pay a bigger dividend?: KMB yields 4.70% and MDLZ yields 3.22% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is KMB or MDLZ more profitable?: KMB runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus MDLZ at 6.64%.
Which has been the better investment, KMB or MDLZ?: Over the past 10-year, MDLZ delivered the higher annualized total return — KMB at 1.60% versus MDLZ at 6.21%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KMB analysis Full MDLZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kimberly-Clark P/E ratio Mondelez International P/E ratio Kimberly-Clark dividend yield Mondelez International dividend yield Kimberly-Clark ROE Mondelez International ROE Kimberly-Clark operating margin Mondelez International operating margin Kimberly-Clark revenue growth Mondelez International revenue growth Kimberly-Clark free cash flow Mondelez International free cash flow

Kimberly-Clark & Mondelez International appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.