Is KLAC or TRNO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, TRNO is cheaper: KLAC trades at a 72.05 P/E and TRNO at 16.49.

Which has grown faster, KLAC or TRNO?

Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — KLAC at a 15.21% CAGR versus TRNO at 20.57%.

Does KLAC or TRNO pay a bigger dividend?

KLAC yields 3.14% and TRNO yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is KLAC or TRNO more profitable?

TRNO runs the higher net margin — KLAC at 35.66% versus TRNO at 86.52%.

Which has been the better investment, KLAC or TRNO?

Over the past 10-year, KLAC delivered the higher annualized total return — KLAC at 67.44% versus TRNO at 13.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO)

TRNO leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of KLA Corporation and Terreno Realty Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Terreno Realty Corporation

$7.15B

$67.27Real Estate

Total return — KLAC vs TRNO

growth of $100 · last 16y

KLAC +8677.2%TRNO +260.7%KLAC compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

KLAC TRNO

KLAC vs TRNO: by the numbers

•KLAC is the larger company ($332.50B vs $7.15B market cap).
•TRNO trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.49 vs 72.05 P/E).
•TRNO converts more revenue to profit (86.52% vs 35.66% net margin).
•TRNO grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.57% vs 15.21% CAGR).
•KLAC pays the higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 3.05%).

Which is better, KLAC or TRNO?

Metric tally: KLAC 6 · TRNO 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTRNO(lower P/E)

GrowthTRNO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeKLAC(higher dividend yield)

QualityKLAC(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	KLAC	TRNO
P/E ratio	72.05	16.49●
Forward P/E	—	40.04
P/S ratio	25.61	14.43●
P/B ratio	57.52	1.65●
PEG ratio	0.06●	0.14
EV / EBITDA	57.56	13.82●
FCF yield	1.20%	2.87%●

Profitability

Metric	KLAC	TRNO
Gross margin	61.75%	63.89%●
Operating margin	42.08%●	40.81%
Net margin	35.66%	86.52%●
ROE	80.11%●	9.88%
ROIC	38.11%●	3.66%

Dividends

Metric	KLAC	TRNO
Dividend yield	3.14%●	3.05%
Payout ratio	262.04%	52.16%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KLAC	TRNO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.21%	20.57%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	31.52%	35.52%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.49%	22.41%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	67.17%●	3.07%

Frequently asked

Which is better, KLAC or TRNO?: It depends on your goal. value: TRNO (lower P/E); growth: TRNO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KLAC (higher dividend yield); quality: KLAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRNO leads 10 to 6.
Is KLAC or TRNO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, TRNO is cheaper: KLAC trades at a 72.05 P/E and TRNO at 16.49.
Which has grown faster, KLAC or TRNO?: Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — KLAC at a 15.21% CAGR versus TRNO at 20.57%.
Does KLAC or TRNO pay a bigger dividend?: KLAC yields 3.14% and TRNO yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is KLAC or TRNO more profitable?: TRNO runs the higher net margin — KLAC at 35.66% versus TRNO at 86.52%.
Which has been the better investment, KLAC or TRNO?: Over the past 10-year, KLAC delivered the higher annualized total return — KLAC at 67.44% versus TRNO at 13.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KLAC analysis Full TRNO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

KLA P/E ratio Terreno Realty P/E ratio KLA dividend yield Terreno Realty dividend yield KLA ROE Terreno Realty ROE KLA operating margin Terreno Realty operating margin KLA revenue growth Terreno Realty revenue growth KLA free cash flow Terreno Realty free cash flow

KLA & Terreno Realty appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.