Is KLAC or POWL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, POWL is cheaper: KLAC trades at a 72.05 P/E and POWL at 57.61.

Which has grown faster, KLAC or POWL?

Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — KLAC at a 15.21% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.

Does KLAC or POWL pay a bigger dividend?

KLAC yields 3.14% and POWL yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is KLAC or POWL more profitable?

KLAC runs the higher net margin — KLAC at 35.66% versus POWL at 16.51%.

Which has been the better investment, KLAC or POWL?

Over the past 10-year, KLAC delivered the higher annualized total return — KLAC at 67.44% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL)

POWL leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of KLA Corporation and Powell Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Powell Industries, Inc.

$10.74B

$294.75Industrials

Total return — KLAC vs POWL

growth of $100 · last 30y

KLAC +19330.5%POWL +7124.3%KLAC compounded faster

KLAC POWL

KLAC vs POWL: by the numbers

•KLAC is the larger company ($332.50B vs $10.74B market cap).
•POWL trades at the lower earnings multiple (57.61 vs 72.05 P/E).
•KLAC converts more revenue to profit (35.66% vs 16.51% net margin).
•POWL grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.84% vs 15.21% CAGR).
•KLAC pays the higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 0.12%).

Which is better, KLAC or POWL?

Metric tally: KLAC 7 · POWL 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePOWL(lower P/E)

GrowthPOWL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeKLAC(higher dividend yield)

QualityKLAC(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	KLAC	POWL
P/E ratio	72.05	57.61●
Forward P/E	—	44.88
P/S ratio	25.61	9.51●
P/B ratio	57.52	15.19●
PEG ratio	0.06●	1.03
EV / EBITDA	57.56	41.17●
FCF yield	1.20%	1.79%●

Profitability

Metric	KLAC	POWL
Gross margin	61.75%●	30.10%
Operating margin	42.08%●	19.76%
Net margin	35.66%●	16.51%
ROE	80.11%●	26.36%
ROIC	38.11%●	25.41%

Dividends

Metric	KLAC	POWL
Dividend yield	3.14%●	0.12%
Payout ratio	262.04%	7.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KLAC	POWL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.21%	19.84%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	31.52%	59.98%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.49%	34.56%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	67.17%	99.30%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, KLAC or POWL?: It depends on your goal. value: POWL (lower P/E); growth: POWL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KLAC (higher dividend yield); quality: KLAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, POWL leads 9 to 7.
Is KLAC or POWL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, POWL is cheaper: KLAC trades at a 72.05 P/E and POWL at 57.61.
Which has grown faster, KLAC or POWL?: Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — KLAC at a 15.21% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.
Does KLAC or POWL pay a bigger dividend?: KLAC yields 3.14% and POWL yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is KLAC or POWL more profitable?: KLAC runs the higher net margin — KLAC at 35.66% versus POWL at 16.51%.
Which has been the better investment, KLAC or POWL?: Over the past 10-year, KLAC delivered the higher annualized total return — KLAC at 67.44% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KLAC analysis Full POWL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

KLA P/E ratio Powell Industries P/E ratio KLA dividend yield Powell Industries dividend yield KLA ROE Powell Industries ROE KLA operating margin Powell Industries operating margin KLA revenue growth Powell Industries revenue growth KLA free cash flow Powell Industries free cash flow

KLA & Powell Industries appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.