Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) vs Ventas, Inc. (VTR)
KIM leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Kimco Realty Corporation and Ventas, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — KIM vs VTR
growth of $100 · last 30yKIM +177.7%VTR +397.6%VTR compounded faster
KIM VTR
KIM vs VTR: by the numbers
- •VTR is the larger company ($41.13B vs $17.47B market cap).
- •KIM trades at the lower earnings multiple (29.44 vs 153.82 P/E).
- •KIM converts more revenue to profit (28.51% vs 4.25% net margin).
- •KIM grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.53% vs 10.67% CAGR).
- •KIM pays the higher dividend yield (3.98% vs 2.32%).
Which is better, KIM or VTR?
Metric tally: KIM 12 · VTR 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKIM(lower P/E)
GrowthKIM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKIM(higher dividend yield)
QualityKIM(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KIM | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 29.44● | 153.82 |
| Forward P/E | 30.36● | 135.58 |
| P/S ratio | 8.06 | 6.71● |
| P/B ratio | 1.68● | 3.14 |
| PEG ratio | 0.46● | 0.80 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.47● | 21.90 |
Profitability
| Metric | KIM | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 54.71%● | -4.26% |
| Operating margin | 36.08%● | 13.38% |
| Net margin | 28.51%● | 4.25% |
| ROE | 5.93%● | 1.98% |
| ROIC | 3.80%● | 3.16% |
Dividends
| Metric | KIM | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.98%● | 2.32% |
| Payout ratio | 124.10% | 356.36% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KIM | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.53%● | 10.67% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -18.16% | -14.16%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.84% | 11.51%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KIM or VTR?
- It depends on your goal. value: KIM (lower P/E); growth: KIM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KIM (higher dividend yield); quality: KIM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KIM leads 12 to 3.
- Is KIM or VTR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KIM is cheaper: KIM trades at a 29.44 P/E and VTR at 153.82.
- Which has grown faster, KIM or VTR?
- Over the past five years, KIM grew revenue faster — KIM at a 15.53% CAGR versus VTR at 10.67%.
- Does KIM or VTR pay a bigger dividend?
- KIM yields 3.98% and VTR yields 2.32% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KIM or VTR more profitable?
- KIM runs the higher net margin — KIM at 28.51% versus VTR at 4.25%.
- Which has been the better investment, KIM or VTR?
- Over the past 10-year, VTR delivered the higher annualized total return — KIM at 3.86% versus VTR at 6.45%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimco Realty P/E ratioVentas P/E ratioKimco Realty dividend yieldVentas dividend yieldKimco Realty ROEVentas ROEKimco Realty operating marginVentas operating marginKimco Realty revenue growthVentas revenue growthKimco Realty free cash flowVentas free cash flow
Kimco Realty & Ventas appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.