Is KIM or TRNO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, TRNO is cheaper: KIM trades at a 29.44 P/E and TRNO at 16.49.

Which has grown faster, KIM or TRNO?

Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — KIM at a 15.53% CAGR versus TRNO at 20.57%.

Does KIM or TRNO pay a bigger dividend?

KIM yields 3.98% and TRNO yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is KIM or TRNO more profitable?

TRNO runs the higher net margin — KIM at 28.51% versus TRNO at 86.52%.

Which has been the better investment, KIM or TRNO?

Over the past 10-year, TRNO delivered the higher annualized total return — KIM at 3.86% versus TRNO at 13.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) vs Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO)

TRNO leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Kimco Realty Corporation and Terreno Realty Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

KIM

Kimco Realty Corporation

$17.47B

$25.91Real Estate

TRNO

Terreno Realty Corporation

$7.15B

$67.27Real Estate

Total return — KIM vs TRNO

growth of $100 · last 16y

KIM +102.4%TRNO +260.7%TRNO compounded faster

KIM TRNO

KIM vs TRNO: by the numbers

•KIM is the larger company ($17.47B vs $7.15B market cap).
•TRNO trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.49 vs 29.44 P/E).
•TRNO converts more revenue to profit (86.52% vs 28.51% net margin).
•TRNO grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.57% vs 15.53% CAGR).
•KIM pays the higher dividend yield (3.98% vs 3.05%).

Which is better, KIM or TRNO?

Metric tally: KIM 5 · TRNO 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTRNO(lower P/E)

GrowthTRNO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeKIM(higher dividend yield)

QualityKIM(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	KIM	TRNO
P/E ratio	29.44	16.49●
Forward P/E	30.36●	40.04
P/S ratio	8.06●	14.43
P/B ratio	1.68	1.65
PEG ratio	0.46	0.14●
EV / EBITDA	16.47	13.82●

Profitability

Metric	KIM	TRNO
Gross margin	54.71%	63.89%●
Operating margin	36.08%	40.81%●
Net margin	28.51%	86.52%●
ROE	5.93%	9.88%●
ROIC	3.80%●	3.66%

Dividends

Metric	KIM	TRNO
Dividend yield	3.98%●	3.05%
Payout ratio	124.10%	52.16%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KIM	TRNO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.53%	20.57%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-18.16%	35.52%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.84%●	3.07%

Frequently asked

Which is better, KIM or TRNO?: It depends on your goal. value: TRNO (lower P/E); growth: TRNO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KIM (higher dividend yield); quality: KIM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRNO leads 9 to 5.
Is KIM or TRNO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, TRNO is cheaper: KIM trades at a 29.44 P/E and TRNO at 16.49.
Which has grown faster, KIM or TRNO?: Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — KIM at a 15.53% CAGR versus TRNO at 20.57%.
Does KIM or TRNO pay a bigger dividend?: KIM yields 3.98% and TRNO yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is KIM or TRNO more profitable?: TRNO runs the higher net margin — KIM at 28.51% versus TRNO at 86.52%.
Which has been the better investment, KIM or TRNO?: Over the past 10-year, TRNO delivered the higher annualized total return — KIM at 3.86% versus TRNO at 13.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KIM analysis Full TRNO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kimco Realty P/E ratio Terreno Realty P/E ratio Kimco Realty dividend yield Terreno Realty dividend yield Kimco Realty ROE Terreno Realty ROE Kimco Realty operating margin Terreno Realty operating margin Kimco Realty revenue growth Terreno Realty revenue growth Kimco Realty free cash flow Terreno Realty free cash flow

Kimco Realty & Terreno Realty appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.