Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)
RL leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Kimco Realty Corporation and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
$25.91Real Estate
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
$403.98Consumer Cyclical
Total return — KIM vs RL
growth of $100 · last 29yKIM +138.1%RL +1182.5%RL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
KIM RL
KIM vs RL: by the numbers
- •RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $17.47B market cap).
- •RL trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.74 vs 29.44 P/E).
- •KIM converts more revenue to profit (28.51% vs 11.60% net margin).
- •KIM grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.53% vs 13.01% CAGR).
- •KIM pays the higher dividend yield (3.98% vs 0.90%).
Which is better, KIM or RL?
Metric tally: KIM 7 · RL 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueRL(lower P/E)
GrowthKIM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKIM(higher dividend yield)
QualityRL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KIM | RL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 29.44 | 26.74● |
| Forward P/E | 30.36 | 22.03● |
| P/S ratio | 8.06 | 3.10● |
| P/B ratio | 1.68● | 8.86 |
| PEG ratio | 0.46● | 0.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.47● | 22.22 |
| FCF yield | — | 2.96% |
Profitability
| Metric | KIM | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 54.71% | 69.87%● |
| Operating margin | 36.08%● | 14.53% |
| Net margin | 28.51%● | 11.60% |
| ROE | 5.93% | 33.13%● |
| ROIC | 3.80% | 19.62%● |
Dividends
| Metric | KIM | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.98%● | 0.90% |
| Payout ratio | 124.10% | 23.67% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KIM | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.53%● | 13.01% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -18.16% | 20.37%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 22.25% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.84% | 29.56%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KIM or RL?
- It depends on your goal. value: RL (lower P/E); growth: KIM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KIM (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 8 to 7.
- Is KIM or RL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, RL is cheaper: KIM trades at a 29.44 P/E and RL at 26.74.
- Which has grown faster, KIM or RL?
- Over the past five years, KIM grew revenue faster — KIM at a 15.53% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
- Does KIM or RL pay a bigger dividend?
- KIM yields 3.98% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KIM or RL more profitable?
- KIM runs the higher net margin — KIM at 28.51% versus RL at 11.60%.
- Which has been the better investment, KIM or RL?
- Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — KIM at 3.86% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimco Realty P/E ratioRalph Lauren P/E ratioKimco Realty dividend yieldRalph Lauren dividend yieldKimco Realty ROERalph Lauren ROEKimco Realty operating marginRalph Lauren operating marginKimco Realty revenue growthRalph Lauren revenue growthKimco Realty free cash flowRalph Lauren free cash flow
Kimco Realty & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.