Which has grown faster, KFRC or SMR?

Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — KFRC at a -1.39% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.

Does KFRC or SMR pay a bigger dividend?

KFRC pays a dividend (2.73% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Is KFRC or SMR more profitable?

KFRC runs the higher net margin — KFRC at 2.60% versus SMR at -2066.55%.

Which has been the better investment, KFRC or SMR?

Over the past 5-year, KFRC delivered the higher annualized total return — KFRC at 14.65% versus SMR at -4.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kforce Inc. (KFRC) vs NuScale Power Corporation (SMR)

KFRC leads on 6 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Kforce Inc. and NuScale Power Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

KFRC

Kforce Inc.

$1.03B

$57.89IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SMR

NuScale Power Corporation

$2.37B

$7.96IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — KFRC vs SMR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

KFRC +64.0%SMR -20.0%KFRC compounded faster

KFRC SMR

KFRC vs SMR: by the numbers

•SMR is the larger company ($2.37B vs $1.03B market cap).
•KFRC is profitable (2.60% net margin) while SMR runs a net loss (-2066.55%).
•SMR grew revenue faster over the past five years (120.81% vs -1.39% CAGR).
•KFRC pays a dividend (2.73% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, KFRC or SMR?

Metric tally: KFRC 6 · SMR 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSMR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityKFRC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KFRC	SMR
P/E ratio	29.69	—
Forward P/E	24.04	—
P/S ratio	0.75●	69.81
P/B ratio	8.48	1.12●
EV / EBITDA	19.73	—
FCF yield	4.35%	—

Profitability

Metric	KFRC	SMR
Gross margin	27.22%	36.31%●
Operating margin	3.80%●	-2190.57%
Net margin	2.60%●	-2066.55%
ROE	29.49%●	-33.06%
ROIC	14.55%●	-61.76%

Dividends

Metric	KFRC	SMR
Dividend yield	2.73%	—
Payout ratio	80.61%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KFRC	SMR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.39%	120.81%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-6.00%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-18.81%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.16%●	-4.42%

Frequently asked

Which is better, KFRC or SMR?: It depends on your goal. growth: SMR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: KFRC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KFRC leads 6 to 3.
Which has grown faster, KFRC or SMR?: Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — KFRC at a -1.39% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.
Does KFRC or SMR pay a bigger dividend?: KFRC pays a dividend (2.73% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.
Is KFRC or SMR more profitable?: KFRC runs the higher net margin — KFRC at 2.60% versus SMR at -2066.55%.
Which has been the better investment, KFRC or SMR?: Over the past 5-year, KFRC delivered the higher annualized total return — KFRC at 14.65% versus SMR at -4.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KFRC analysis Full SMR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kforce P/E ratio NuScale Power P/E ratio Kforce dividend yield NuScale Power dividend yield Kforce ROE NuScale Power ROE Kforce operating margin NuScale Power operating margin Kforce revenue growth NuScale Power revenue growth Kforce free cash flow NuScale Power free cash flow

Kforce & NuScale Power appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.