Which has grown faster, KBR or SMR?

Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — KBR at a 6.20% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.

Does KBR or SMR pay a bigger dividend?

KBR pays a dividend (1.91% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Is KBR or SMR more profitable?

KBR runs the higher net margin — KBR at 5.21% versus SMR at -2066.55%.

Which has been the better investment, KBR or SMR?

Over the past 5-year, KBR delivered the higher annualized total return — KBR at 10.36% versus SMR at -4.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

KBR, Inc. (KBR) vs NuScale Power Corporation (SMR)

KBR leads on 6 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of KBR, Inc. and NuScale Power Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

KBR

KBR, Inc.

$4.38B

$34.57IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SMR

NuScale Power Corporation

$2.37B

$7.96IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — KBR vs SMR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

KBR +32.7%SMR -20.0%KBR compounded faster

KBR SMR

KBR vs SMR: by the numbers

•KBR is the larger company ($4.38B vs $2.37B market cap).
•KBR is profitable (5.21% net margin) while SMR runs a net loss (-2066.55%).
•SMR grew revenue faster over the past five years (120.81% vs 6.20% CAGR).
•KBR pays a dividend (1.91% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, KBR or SMR?

Metric tally: KBR 6 · SMR 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSMR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityKBR(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KBR	SMR
P/E ratio	11.08	—
Forward P/E	9.07	—
P/S ratio	0.57●	69.81
P/B ratio	2.77	1.12●
PEG ratio	0.84	—
EV / EBITDA	7.81	—
FCF yield	11.14%	—

Profitability

Metric	KBR	SMR
Gross margin	14.50%	36.31%●
Operating margin	9.26%●	-2190.57%
Net margin	5.21%●	-2066.55%
ROE	25.32%●	-33.06%
ROIC	8.47%●	-61.76%

Dividends

Metric	KBR	SMR
Dividend yield	1.91%	—
Payout ratio	20.56%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KBR	SMR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.20%	120.81%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.41%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.79%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-1.31%●	-4.42%

Frequently asked

Which is better, KBR or SMR?: It depends on your goal. growth: SMR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: KBR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KBR leads 6 to 3.
Which has grown faster, KBR or SMR?: Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — KBR at a 6.20% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.
Does KBR or SMR pay a bigger dividend?: KBR pays a dividend (1.91% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.
Is KBR or SMR more profitable?: KBR runs the higher net margin — KBR at 5.21% versus SMR at -2066.55%.
Which has been the better investment, KBR or SMR?: Over the past 5-year, KBR delivered the higher annualized total return — KBR at 10.36% versus SMR at -4.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KBR analysis Full SMR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

KBR P/E ratio NuScale Power P/E ratio KBR dividend yield NuScale Power dividend yield KBR ROE NuScale Power ROE KBR operating margin NuScale Power operating margin KBR revenue growth NuScale Power revenue growth KBR free cash flow NuScale Power free cash flow

KBR & NuScale Power appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.