On trailing earnings, TGT is cheaper: K trades at a 22.90 P/E and TGT at 17.86.

Which has grown faster, K or TGT?

Over the past five years, TGT grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus TGT at 1.62%.

Does K or TGT pay a bigger dividend?

K yields 1.39% and TGT yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is K or TGT more profitable?

K runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus TGT at 3.24%.

Which has been the better investment, K or TGT?

Over the past 10-year, TGT delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus TGT at 10.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kellanova (K) vs Target Corporation (TGT)

K and TGT are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of Kellanova and Target Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Kellanova

$29.03B

$83.44Consumer Defensive

TGT

Target Corporation

$61.42B

$135.23Consumer Defensive

Total return — K vs TGT

growth of $100 · last 29y

K +154.5%TGT +927.7%TGT compounded faster

K TGT

K vs TGT: by the numbers

•TGT is the larger company ($61.42B vs $29.03B market cap).
•TGT trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.86 vs 22.90 P/E).
•K converts more revenue to profit (10.08% vs 3.24% net margin).
•TGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.62% vs -1.30% CAGR).
•TGT pays the higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 1.39%).

Which is better, K or TGT?

Metric tally: K 8 · TGT 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTGT(lower P/E)

GrowthTGT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeTGT(higher dividend yield)

QualityK(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	K	TGT
P/E ratio	22.90	17.86●
Forward P/E	22.06	15.08●
P/S ratio	2.30	0.58●
P/B ratio	6.95	3.76●
PEG ratio	0.51	—
EV / EBITDA	15.66	9.59●
FCF yield	2.05%	5.07%●

Profitability

Metric	K	TGT
Gross margin	34.81%●	28.14%
Operating margin	14.61%●	4.49%
Net margin	10.08%●	3.24%
ROE	30.38%●	21.04%
ROIC	12.91%●	9.76%

Dividends

Metric	K	TGT
Dividend yield	1.39%	3.37%●
Payout ratio	29.59%	55.88%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	K	TGT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.30%	1.62%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.30%●	-1.34%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-15.22%●	-17.01%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.22%●	-7.66%

Frequently asked

Which is better, K or TGT?: It depends on your goal. value: TGT (lower P/E); growth: TGT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TGT (higher dividend yield); quality: K (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is K or TGT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, TGT is cheaper: K trades at a 22.90 P/E and TGT at 17.86.
Which has grown faster, K or TGT?: Over the past five years, TGT grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus TGT at 1.62%.
Does K or TGT pay a bigger dividend?: K yields 1.39% and TGT yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is K or TGT more profitable?: K runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus TGT at 3.24%.
Which has been the better investment, K or TGT?: Over the past 10-year, TGT delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus TGT at 10.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full K analysis Full TGT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kellanova P/E ratio Target P/E ratio Kellanova dividend yield Target dividend yield Kellanova ROE Target ROE Kellanova operating margin Target operating margin Kellanova revenue growth Target revenue growth Kellanova free cash flow Target free cash flow

Kellanova & Target appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.