On trailing earnings, SYY is cheaper: K trades at a 22.90 P/E and SYY at 21.94.

Which has grown faster, K or SYY?

Over the past five years, SYY grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus SYY at 13.67%.

Does K or SYY pay a bigger dividend?

K yields 1.39% and SYY yields 2.73% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is K or SYY more profitable?

K runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus SYY at 2.08%.

Which has been the better investment, K or SYY?

Over the past 10-year, SYY delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus SYY at 7.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kellanova (K) vs Sysco Corporation (SYY)

SYY leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Kellanova and Sysco Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Kellanova

$29.03B

$83.44Consumer Defensive

SYY

Sysco Corporation

$37.87B

$79.19Consumer Defensive

Total return — K vs SYY

growth of $100 · last 29y

K +152.3%SYY +757.0%SYY compounded faster

K SYY

K vs SYY: by the numbers

•SYY is the larger company ($37.87B vs $29.03B market cap).
•SYY trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.94 vs 22.90 P/E).
•K converts more revenue to profit (10.08% vs 2.08% net margin).
•SYY grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.67% vs -1.30% CAGR).
•SYY pays the higher dividend yield (2.73% vs 1.39%).

Which is better, K or SYY?

Metric tally: K 5 · SYY 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSYY(lower P/E)

GrowthSYY(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSYY(higher dividend yield)

Valuation

Metric	K	SYY
P/E ratio	22.90	21.94●
Forward P/E	22.06	16.00●
P/S ratio	2.30	0.46●
P/B ratio	6.95●	16.59
PEG ratio	0.51	0.40●
EV / EBITDA	15.66	13.10●
FCF yield	2.05%	5.24%●

Profitability

Metric	K	SYY
Gross margin	34.81%●	18.54%
Operating margin	14.61%●	3.59%
Net margin	10.08%●	2.08%
ROE	30.38%	75.58%●
ROIC	12.91%	13.03%

Dividends

Metric	K	SYY
Dividend yield	1.39%	2.73%●
Payout ratio	29.59%	57.75%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	K	SYY
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.30%	13.67%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.30%	54.83%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-15.22%	3.87%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.22%●	2.52%

Frequently asked

Which is better, K or SYY?: It depends on your goal. value: SYY (lower P/E); growth: SYY (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SYY (higher dividend yield). Across all compared metrics, SYY leads 11 to 5.
Is K or SYY cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SYY is cheaper: K trades at a 22.90 P/E and SYY at 21.94.
Which has grown faster, K or SYY?: Over the past five years, SYY grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus SYY at 13.67%.
Does K or SYY pay a bigger dividend?: K yields 1.39% and SYY yields 2.73% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is K or SYY more profitable?: K runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus SYY at 2.08%.
Which has been the better investment, K or SYY?: Over the past 10-year, SYY delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus SYY at 7.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full K analysis Full SYY analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kellanova P/E ratio Sysco P/E ratio Kellanova dividend yield Sysco dividend yield Kellanova ROE Sysco ROE Kellanova operating margin Sysco operating margin Kellanova revenue growth Sysco revenue growth Kellanova free cash flow Sysco free cash flow

Kellanova & Sysco appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.