Kellanova (K) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
MNST leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though K is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Kellanova and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
K
Kellanova
$83.44Consumer Defensive
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
Total return — K vs MNST
growth of $100 · last 29yK +153.6%MNST +567137.5%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
K MNST
K vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($90.79B vs $29.03B market cap).
- •K trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.90 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 10.08% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs -1.30% CAGR).
- •K pays a dividend (1.39% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, K or MNST?
Metric tally: K 7 · MNST 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueK(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | K | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 22.90● | 44.85 |
| Forward P/E | 22.06● | 35.95 |
| P/S ratio | 2.30● | 10.43 |
| P/B ratio | 6.95● | 10.51 |
| PEG ratio | 0.51● | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.66● | 32.31 |
| FCF yield | 2.05% | 2.26%● |
Profitability
| Metric | K | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 34.81% | 55.47%● |
| Operating margin | 14.61% | 29.34%● |
| Net margin | 10.08% | 23.11%● |
| ROE | 30.38%● | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 12.91% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | K | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | — |
| Payout ratio | 29.59% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | K | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.30% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.30% | 7.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -15.22% | 10.53%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.22% | 14.70%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, K or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: K (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 9 to 7.
- Is K or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, K is cheaper: K trades at a 22.90 P/E and MNST at 44.85.
- Which has grown faster, K or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — K at a -1.30% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does K or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- K pays a dividend (1.39% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is K or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — K at 10.08% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, K or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — K at 5.79% versus MNST at 13.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kellanova P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioKellanova dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldKellanova ROEMonster Beverage ROEKellanova operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginKellanova revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthKellanova free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Kellanova & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.