Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)
JKHY leads on 7 of 11 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 2, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — JKHY vs WULF
growth of $100 · last 30yJKHY +2358.2%WULF +765.0%JKHY compounded faster
JKHY WULF
JKHY vs WULF: by the numbers
- •WULF is the larger company ($10.50B vs $10.44B market cap).
- •JKHY is profitable (20.64% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
- •WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 7.92% CAGR).
- •JKHY pays a dividend (1.71% yield) while WULF does not currently pay one.
Which is better, JKHY or WULF?
Metric tally: JKHY 7 · WULF 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthWULF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityJKHY(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | JKHY | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.92 | — |
| Forward P/E | 20.79 | — |
| P/S ratio | 4.07● | 59.35 |
| P/B ratio | 4.80● | 66.76 |
| PEG ratio | 1.51 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.94 | — |
| FCF yield | 7.10% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | JKHY | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.06% | 50.93%● |
| Operating margin | 26.00%● | -101.10% |
| Net margin | 20.64%● | -611.46% |
| ROE | 24.32%● | -470.94% |
| ROIC | 17.63%● | -3.18% |
Dividends
| Metric | JKHY | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | — |
| Payout ratio | 39.10% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | JKHY | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.92% | 66.83%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 10.08%● | -27.04% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 16.50% | 26.65%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.13% | 3.85%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, JKHY or WULF?
- It depends on your goal. growth: WULF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: JKHY (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, JKHY leads 7 to 4.
- Which has grown faster, JKHY or WULF?
- Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — JKHY at a 7.92% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
- Does JKHY or WULF pay a bigger dividend?
- JKHY pays a dividend (1.71% yield) while WULF does not currently pay one.
- Is JKHY or WULF more profitable?
- JKHY runs the higher net margin — JKHY at 20.64% versus WULF at -611.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, JKHY or WULF?
- Over the past 10-year, WULF delivered the higher annualized total return — JKHY at 6.64% versus WULF at 9.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Jack Henry & Associates P/E ratioTeraWulf P/E ratioJack Henry & Associates dividend yieldTeraWulf dividend yieldJack Henry & Associates ROETeraWulf ROEJack Henry & Associates operating marginTeraWulf operating marginJack Henry & Associates revenue growthTeraWulf revenue growthJack Henry & Associates free cash flowTeraWulf free cash flow
Jack Henry & Associates & TeraWulf appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 2, 2026.