iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) vs U.S. Bancorp (USB)
Over the past 10 years, USB lagged IWM — 7.29% vs 11.12% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of iShares Russell 2000 ETF and U.S. Bancorp across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — IWM vs USB
growth of $100 · last 26yDid USB beat IWM?
Over the past 10 years, USB lagged IWM — 7.29% vs 11.12% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | IWM | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 39.19% | 39.13% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 17.68% | 28.13%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.07%● | 4.33% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 11.12%● | 7.29% |
IWM is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has USB beaten IWM?
- Over the past 10 years, USB lagged IWM — 7.29% vs 11.12% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.