Which has grown faster, IT or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — IT at a 9.12% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.

Is IT or WULF more profitable?

IT runs the higher net margin — IT at 11.44% versus WULF at -611.46%.

Which has been the better investment, IT or WULF?

Over the past 10-year, WULF delivered the higher annualized total return — IT at 3.59% versus WULF at 6.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Gartner, Inc. (IT) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

IT leads on 8 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Gartner, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 18, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Gartner, Inc.

$9.39B

$140.19TechnologyAt close: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

WULF

TeraWulf Inc.

$9.00B

$18.16TechnologyAt close: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — IT vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

IT +336.4%WULF +856.2%WULF compounded faster

IT WULF

IT vs WULF: by the numbers

•IT is the larger company ($9.39B vs $9.00B market cap).
•IT is profitable (11.44% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 9.12% CAGR).

Which is better, IT or WULF?

Metric tally: IT 8 · WULF 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWULF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityIT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	IT	WULF
P/E ratio	13.85	—
Forward P/E	10.24	—
P/S ratio	1.52●	45.71
P/B ratio	154.75	51.41●
PEG ratio	0.52	—
EV / EBITDA	9.13	—
FCF yield	12.82%	—

Profitability

Metric	IT	WULF
Gross margin	68.25%●	50.93%
Operating margin	16.43%●	-101.10%
Net margin	11.44%●	-611.46%
ROE	1168.41%●	-470.94%
ROIC	18.78%●	-3.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IT	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.12%	66.83%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	26.49%●	-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.16%●	-2.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-11.16%	3.32%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, IT or WULF?: It depends on your goal. growth: WULF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: IT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, IT leads 8 to 3.
Which has grown faster, IT or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — IT at a 9.12% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
Is IT or WULF more profitable?: IT runs the higher net margin — IT at 11.44% versus WULF at -611.46%.
Which has been the better investment, IT or WULF?: Over the past 10-year, WULF delivered the higher annualized total return — IT at 3.59% versus WULF at 6.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IT analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Gartner P/E ratio TeraWulf P/E ratio Gartner dividend yield TeraWulf dividend yield Gartner ROE TeraWulf ROE Gartner operating margin TeraWulf operating margin Gartner revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth Gartner free cash flow TeraWulf free cash flow

Gartner & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 18, 2026.