Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
TRI leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Ingersoll Rand Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$84.31IndustrialsAt close: Jul 23, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$85.69IndustrialsAt close: Jul 23, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — IR vs TRI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9yIR +399.0%TRI +100.7%IR compounded faster
IR TRI
IR vs TRI: by the numbers
- •TRI is the larger company ($37.41B vs $32.99B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.06 vs 56.97 P/E).
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 7.54% net margin).
- •IR grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.25% vs 4.86% CAGR).
- •TRI pays the higher dividend yield (4.60% vs 0.09%).
Which is better, IR or TRI?
Metric tally: IR 4 · TRI 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRI(lower P/E)
GrowthIR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRI(higher dividend yield)
QualityTRI(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | IR | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 56.97 | 25.06● |
| Forward P/E | 24.04 | 19.67● |
| P/S ratio | 4.25● | 4.90 |
| P/B ratio | 3.25 | 3.17● |
| PEG ratio | 5.17 | 3.47● |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.30 | 13.22● |
| FCF yield | 3.51% | 5.57%● |
Profitability
| Metric | IR | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.24% | 75.81%● |
| Operating margin | 18.06% | 26.66%● |
| Net margin | 7.54% | 19.93%● |
| ROE | 5.77% | 12.89%● |
| ROIC | 6.34% | 10.13%● |
Dividends
| Metric | IR | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.09% | 4.60%● |
| Payout ratio | 5.48% | 116.05% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | IR | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.25%● | 4.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.01%● | 7.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.93% | 9.45%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.77%● | -3.08% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, IR or TRI?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRI (lower P/E); growth: IR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRI (higher dividend yield); quality: TRI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRI leads 13 to 4.
- Is IR or TRI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRI is cheaper: IR trades at a 56.97 P/E and TRI at 25.06.
- Which has grown faster, IR or TRI?
- Over the past five years, IR grew revenue faster — IR at a 10.25% CAGR versus TRI at 4.86%.
- Does IR or TRI pay a bigger dividend?
- IR yields 0.09% and TRI yields 4.60% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is IR or TRI more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — IR at 7.54% versus TRI at 19.93%.
- Which has been the better investment, IR or TRI?
- Over the past 5-year, IR delivered the higher annualized total return — IR at 11.77% versus TRI at 7.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ingersoll Rand P/E ratioThomson Reuters P/E ratioIngersoll Rand dividend yieldThomson Reuters dividend yieldIngersoll Rand ROEThomson Reuters ROEIngersoll Rand operating marginThomson Reuters operating marginIngersoll Rand revenue growthThomson Reuters revenue growthIngersoll Rand free cash flowThomson Reuters free cash flow
Ingersoll Rand & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 24, 2026.