Which has the lower trailing P/E, IR or P?

IR has the lower trailing P/E: IR trades at 33.13 and P at 164.47. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, IR or P?

Over the past five years, P grew revenue faster — IR at a 9.56% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.

Does IR or P pay a bigger dividend?

IR pays a dividend (0.10% yield), while P has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is IR or P more profitable?

IR runs the higher net margin — IR at 12.08% versus P at 5.75%.

How have IR and P total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, IR delivered 10.08% and P delivered 24.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) vs Everpure, Inc. (P)

A side-by-side comparison of Ingersoll Rand Inc. and Everpure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Ingersoll Rand Inc.

$31.51B

$80.51IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Everpure, Inc.

$36.09B

$108.55IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — IR vs P

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y

IR +376.6% (+18.9%/yr)P +846.4% (+28.4%/yr)P compounded faster over this window

IR P

IR vs P: by the numbers

•P is the larger company ($36.09B vs $31.51B market cap).
•IR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.13 vs 164.47 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•IR converts more revenue to profit (12.08% vs 5.75% net margin).
•P grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.87% vs 9.56% CAGR).
•IR pays a dividend (0.10% yield), while P has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	IR	P
P/E ratio	33.13	164.47
Forward P/E	22.71	55.78
P/S ratio	3.97	9.00
P/B ratio	3.10	24.58
EV / EBITDA	15.91	108.81
FCF yield	3.86%	1.46%

Profitability

Metric	IR	P
Gross margin	37.94%	70.23%
Operating margin	21.52%	4.21%
Net margin	12.08%	5.75%
ROE	9.42%	15.69%
ROIC	8.36%	5.09%

Dividends

Metric	IR	P
Dividend yield	0.10%	N/A
Payout ratio	5.48%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IR	P
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.56%	17.87%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.01%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.43%	47.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.08%	40.79%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, IR or P?: IR has the lower trailing P/E: IR trades at 33.13 and P at 164.47. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, IR or P?: Over the past five years, P grew revenue faster — IR at a 9.56% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.
Does IR or P pay a bigger dividend?: IR pays a dividend (0.10% yield), while P has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is IR or P more profitable?: IR runs the higher net margin — IR at 12.08% versus P at 5.75%.
How have IR and P total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, IR delivered 10.08% and P delivered 24.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IR analysis Full P analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ingersoll R P/E ratio Everpure P/E ratio Ingersoll R dividend yield Ingersoll R ROE Everpure ROE Ingersoll R operating margin Everpure operating margin Ingersoll R revenue growth Everpure revenue growth Ingersoll R free cash flow Everpure free cash flow

Ingersoll R & Everpure appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.