On trailing earnings, IR is cheaper: IR trades at a 51.83 P/E and P at 117.77.

Which has grown faster, IR or P?

Over the past five years, P grew revenue faster — IR at a 10.25% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.

Does IR or P pay a bigger dividend?

IR pays a dividend (0.10% yield) while P does not currently pay one.

Is IR or P more profitable?

IR runs the higher net margin — IR at 7.54% versus P at 5.75%.

Which has been the better investment, IR or P?

Over the past 5-year, P delivered the higher annualized total return — IR at 9.84% versus P at 21.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) vs Everpure, Inc. (P)

IR leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Ingersoll Rand Inc. and Everpure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — IR vs P

growth of $100 · last 9y

IR +263.6%P +583.0%P compounded faster

IR P

IR vs P: by the numbers

•IR is the larger company ($30.15B vs $26.92B market cap).
•IR trades at the lower earnings multiple (51.83 vs 117.77 P/E).
•IR converts more revenue to profit (7.54% vs 5.75% net margin).
•P grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.87% vs 10.25% CAGR).
•IR pays a dividend (0.10% yield) while P does not currently pay one.

Which is better, IR or P?

Metric tally: IR 9 · P 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueIR(lower P/E)

GrowthP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityIR(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	IR	P
P/E ratio	51.83●	117.77
Forward P/E	21.88●	39.95
P/S ratio	3.86●	6.45
P/B ratio	2.96●	17.60
PEG ratio	4.71	2.96●
EV / EBITDA	17.73●	77.38
FCF yield	3.86%●	0.62%

Profitability

Metric	IR	P
Gross margin	38.24%	70.23%●
Operating margin	18.06%●	4.21%
Net margin	7.54%●	5.75%
ROE	5.77%	15.69%●
ROIC	6.34%●	3.43%

Dividends

Metric	IR	P
Dividend yield	0.10%	—
Payout ratio	5.48%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IR	P
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.25%	17.87%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.01%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.93%	15.82%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	9.84%	32.78%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, IR or P?: It depends on your goal. value: IR (lower P/E); growth: P (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: IR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, IR leads 9 to 6.
Is IR or P cheaper?: On trailing earnings, IR is cheaper: IR trades at a 51.83 P/E and P at 117.77.
Which has grown faster, IR or P?: Over the past five years, P grew revenue faster — IR at a 10.25% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.
Does IR or P pay a bigger dividend?: IR pays a dividend (0.10% yield) while P does not currently pay one.
Is IR or P more profitable?: IR runs the higher net margin — IR at 7.54% versus P at 5.75%.
Which has been the better investment, IR or P?: Over the past 5-year, P delivered the higher annualized total return — IR at 9.84% versus P at 21.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IR analysis Full P analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ingersoll Rand P/E ratio Everpure P/E ratio Ingersoll Rand dividend yield Everpure dividend yield Ingersoll Rand ROE Everpure ROE Ingersoll Rand operating margin Everpure operating margin Ingersoll Rand revenue growth Everpure revenue growth Ingersoll Rand free cash flow Everpure free cash flow

Ingersoll Rand & Everpure appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.