Is IR or MTZ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, IR is cheaper: IR trades at a 54.98 P/E and MTZ at 69.40.

Which has grown faster, IR or MTZ?

Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — IR at a 10.25% CAGR versus MTZ at 18.00%.

Does IR or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?

IR pays a dividend (0.10% yield) while MTZ does not currently pay one.

Is IR or MTZ more profitable?

IR runs the higher net margin — IR at 7.54% versus MTZ at 3.00%.

Which has been the better investment, IR or MTZ?

Over the past 5-year, MTZ delivered the higher annualized total return — IR at 10.80% versus MTZ at 33.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) vs MasTec, Inc. (MTZ)

IR leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Ingersoll Rand Inc. and MasTec, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — IR vs MTZ

growth of $100 · last 9y

IR +285.6%MTZ +783.5%MTZ compounded faster

IR MTZ

IR vs MTZ: by the numbers

•IR is the larger company ($31.84B vs $31.32B market cap).
•IR trades at the lower earnings multiple (54.98 vs 69.40 P/E).
•IR converts more revenue to profit (7.54% vs 3.00% net margin).
•MTZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.00% vs 10.25% CAGR).
•IR pays a dividend (0.10% yield) while MTZ does not currently pay one.

Which is better, IR or MTZ?

Metric tally: IR 10 · MTZ 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueIR(lower P/E)

GrowthMTZ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMTZ(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	IR	MTZ
P/E ratio	54.98●	69.40
Forward P/E	23.21●	34.04
P/S ratio	4.10	2.04●
P/B ratio	3.14●	9.43
PEG ratio	4.99	0.29●
EV / EBITDA	18.69●	27.73
FCF yield	3.64%●	0.82%

Profitability

Metric	IR	MTZ
Gross margin	38.24%●	11.30%
Operating margin	18.06%●	5.65%
Net margin	7.54%●	3.00%
ROE	5.77%	13.86%●
ROIC	6.34%	7.44%●

Dividends

Metric	IR	MTZ
Dividend yield	0.10%	—
Payout ratio	5.48%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IR	MTZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.25%	18.00%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.01%●	2.94%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.93%●	-19.53%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.80%	29.75%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, IR or MTZ?: It depends on your goal. value: IR (lower P/E); growth: MTZ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MTZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, IR leads 10 to 6.
Is IR or MTZ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, IR is cheaper: IR trades at a 54.98 P/E and MTZ at 69.40.
Which has grown faster, IR or MTZ?: Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — IR at a 10.25% CAGR versus MTZ at 18.00%.
Does IR or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?: IR pays a dividend (0.10% yield) while MTZ does not currently pay one.
Is IR or MTZ more profitable?: IR runs the higher net margin — IR at 7.54% versus MTZ at 3.00%.
Which has been the better investment, IR or MTZ?: Over the past 5-year, MTZ delivered the higher annualized total return — IR at 10.80% versus MTZ at 33.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IR analysis Full MTZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ingersoll Rand P/E ratio MasTec P/E ratio Ingersoll Rand dividend yield MasTec dividend yield Ingersoll Rand ROE MasTec ROE Ingersoll Rand operating margin MasTec operating margin Ingersoll Rand revenue growth MasTec revenue growth Ingersoll Rand free cash flow MasTec free cash flow

Ingersoll Rand & MasTec appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.