Which has grown faster, IFF or MP?

Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — IFF at a 11.71% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.

Does IFF or MP pay a bigger dividend?

IFF pays a dividend (2.04% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Is IFF or MP more profitable?

IFF runs the higher net margin — IFF at 7.90% versus MP at -20.48%.

Which has been the better investment, IFF or MP?

Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — IFF at -2.51% versus MP at 12.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) vs MP Materials Corp. (MP)

IFF leads on 9 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. and MP Materials Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

IFF

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.

$19.98B

$78.27Basic Materials

MP Materials Corp.

$10.25B

$57.55Basic Materials

Total return — IFF vs MP

growth of $100 · last 6y

IFF -37.9%MP +475.5%MP compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

IFF MP

IFF vs MP: by the numbers

•IFF is the larger company ($19.98B vs $10.25B market cap).
•IFF is profitable (7.90% net margin) while MP runs a net loss (-20.48%).
•MP grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.90% vs 11.71% CAGR).
•IFF pays a dividend (2.04% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, IFF or MP?

Metric tally: IFF 9 · MP 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityIFF(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	IFF	MP
P/E ratio	23.94	—
Forward P/E	17.64●	52.55
P/S ratio	1.86●	32.99
P/B ratio	1.42●	4.82
PEG ratio	0.19	—
EV / EBITDA	12.72●	619.59
FCF yield	1.98%	—

Profitability

Metric	IFF	MP
Gross margin	36.35%●	24.16%
Operating margin	7.56%●	-39.42%
Net margin	7.90%●	-20.48%
ROE	6.03%●	-2.99%
ROIC	3.19%●	-2.36%

Dividends

Metric	IFF	MP
Dividend yield	2.04%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IFF	MP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.71%	14.90%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-25.13%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-13.45%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-9.54%	12.44%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, IFF or MP?: It depends on your goal. growth: MP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: IFF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, IFF leads 9 to 2.
Which has grown faster, IFF or MP?: Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — IFF at a 11.71% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.
Does IFF or MP pay a bigger dividend?: IFF pays a dividend (2.04% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.
Is IFF or MP more profitable?: IFF runs the higher net margin — IFF at 7.90% versus MP at -20.48%.
Which has been the better investment, IFF or MP?: Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — IFF at -2.51% versus MP at 12.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IFF analysis Full MP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

International Flavors & Fragrances P/E ratio MP Materials P/E ratio International Flavors & Fragrances dividend yield MP Materials dividend yield International Flavors & Fragrances ROE MP Materials ROE International Flavors & Fragrances operating margin MP Materials operating margin International Flavors & Fragrances revenue growth MP Materials revenue growth International Flavors & Fragrances free cash flow MP Materials free cash flow

International Flavors & Fragrances & MP Materials appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.