Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) vs Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO)
TRNO leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and Terreno Realty Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
$140.53Financial Services
TRNO
Terreno Realty Corporation
$67.27Real Estate
Total return — ICE vs TRNO
growth of $100 · last 16yICE +634.2%TRNO +260.7%ICE compounded faster
ICE TRNO
ICE vs TRNO: by the numbers
- •ICE is the larger company ($79.47B vs $7.15B market cap).
- •TRNO trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.49 vs 20.46 P/E).
- •TRNO converts more revenue to profit (86.52% vs 29.98% net margin).
- •TRNO grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.57% vs 8.85% CAGR).
- •TRNO pays the higher dividend yield (3.05% vs 1.05%).
Which is better, ICE or TRNO?
Metric tally: ICE 7 · TRNO 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRNO(lower P/E)
GrowthTRNO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRNO(higher dividend yield)
QualityICE(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ICE | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.46 | 16.49● |
| Forward P/E | 15.96● | 40.04 |
| P/S ratio | 6.13● | 14.43 |
| P/B ratio | 2.71 | 1.65● |
| PEG ratio | 1.34 | 0.14● |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.01 | 13.82● |
| FCF yield | 5.69%● | 2.87% |
Profitability
| Metric | ICE | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 68.98%● | 63.89% |
| Operating margin | 40.84% | 40.81% |
| Net margin | 29.98% | 86.52%● |
| ROE | 13.26%● | 9.88% |
| ROIC | 7.03%● | 3.66% |
Dividends
| Metric | ICE | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 3.05%● |
| Payout ratio | 25.52% | 52.16% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ICE | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.85% | 20.57%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.88% | 35.52%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.64% | 22.41%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.87%● | 3.07% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ICE or TRNO?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRNO (lower P/E); growth: TRNO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRNO (higher dividend yield); quality: ICE (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRNO leads 9 to 7.
- Is ICE or TRNO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRNO is cheaper: ICE trades at a 20.46 P/E and TRNO at 16.49.
- Which has grown faster, ICE or TRNO?
- Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — ICE at a 8.85% CAGR versus TRNO at 20.57%.
- Does ICE or TRNO pay a bigger dividend?
- ICE yields 1.05% and TRNO yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ICE or TRNO more profitable?
- TRNO runs the higher net margin — ICE at 29.98% versus TRNO at 86.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, ICE or TRNO?
- Over the past 10-year, TRNO delivered the higher annualized total return — ICE at 11.81% versus TRNO at 13.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Intercontinental Exchange P/E ratioTerreno Realty P/E ratioIntercontinental Exchange dividend yieldTerreno Realty dividend yieldIntercontinental Exchange ROETerreno Realty ROEIntercontinental Exchange operating marginTerreno Realty operating marginIntercontinental Exchange revenue growthTerreno Realty revenue growthIntercontinental Exchange free cash flowTerreno Realty free cash flow
Intercontinental Exchange & Terreno Realty appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.