Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC)
MMC leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
$140.53Financial Services
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$171.14Financial Services
Total return — ICE vs MMC
growth of $100 · last 20yICE +2052.9%MMC +491.4%ICE compounded faster
ICE MMC
ICE vs MMC: by the numbers
- •MMC is the larger company ($89.82B vs $79.47B market cap).
- •MMC trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.30 vs 20.46 P/E).
- •ICE converts more revenue to profit (29.98% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •MMC grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.28% vs 8.85% CAGR).
- •MMC pays the higher dividend yield (2.10% vs 1.05%).
Which is better, ICE or MMC?
Metric tally: ICE 6 · MMC 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthMMC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMC(higher dividend yield)
QualityMMC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ICE | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.46 | 20.30 |
| Forward P/E | 15.96● | 16.60 |
| P/S ratio | 6.13 | 3.11● |
| P/B ratio | 2.71● | 5.48 |
| PEG ratio | 1.34● | 7.85 |
Profitability
| Metric | ICE | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 68.98%● | 20.12% |
| Operating margin | 40.84%● | 21.70% |
| Net margin | 29.98%● | 14.26% |
| ROE | 13.26% | 26.51%● |
| ROIC | 7.03% | 12.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ICE | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 2.10%● |
| Payout ratio | 25.52% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ICE | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.85% | 9.28%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.88% | 16.34%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.87% | 10.12%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ICE or MMC?
- It depends on your goal. growth: MMC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMC (higher dividend yield); quality: MMC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MMC leads 7 to 6.
- Is ICE or MMC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MMC is cheaper: ICE trades at a 20.46 P/E and MMC at 20.30.
- Which has grown faster, ICE or MMC?
- Over the past five years, MMC grew revenue faster — ICE at a 8.85% CAGR versus MMC at 9.28%.
- Does ICE or MMC pay a bigger dividend?
- ICE yields 1.05% and MMC yields 2.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ICE or MMC more profitable?
- ICE runs the higher net margin — ICE at 29.98% versus MMC at 14.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, ICE or MMC?
- Over the past 10-year, MMC delivered the higher annualized total return — ICE at 11.81% versus MMC at 13.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Intercontinental Exchange P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioIntercontinental Exchange dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldIntercontinental Exchange ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEIntercontinental Exchange operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginIntercontinental Exchange revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthIntercontinental Exchange free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Intercontinental Exchange & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.