Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
STZ leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Hormel Foods Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
$24.75Consumer Defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — HRL vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 30yHRL +695.8%STZ +3669.3%STZ compounded faster
HRL STZ
HRL vs STZ: by the numbers
- •STZ is the larger company ($25.47B vs $13.62B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 29.12 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 3.82% net margin).
- •HRL grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.36% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •HRL pays the higher dividend yield (4.71% vs 2.75%).
Which is better, HRL or STZ?
Metric tally: HRL 5 · STZ 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthHRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeHRL(higher dividend yield)
QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | HRL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 29.12 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | 16.65 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 1.12● | 2.82 |
| P/B ratio | 1.71● | 3.19 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.60 | 11.70● |
| FCF yield | 5.08% | 6.95%● |
Profitability
| Metric | HRL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 15.72% | 51.67%● |
| Operating margin | 5.75% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | 3.82% | 18.46%● |
| ROE | 5.87% | 20.87%● |
| ROIC | 4.31% | 10.48%● |
Dividends
| Metric | HRL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.71%● | 2.75% |
| Payout ratio | 133.91% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HRL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.36%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -11.68% | -1.59%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.04%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.78% | -7.36%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, HRL or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: HRL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: HRL (higher dividend yield); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 11 to 5.
- Is HRL or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: HRL trades at a 29.12 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, HRL or STZ?
- Over the past five years, HRL grew revenue faster — HRL at a 4.36% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does HRL or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- HRL yields 4.71% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is HRL or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — HRL at 3.82% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, HRL or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, STZ delivered the higher annualized total return — HRL at -0.77% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Hormel Foods P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioHormel Foods dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldHormel Foods ROEConstellation Brands ROEHormel Foods operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginHormel Foods revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthHormel Foods free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Hormel Foods & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.