Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC)
MMC leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Robinhood Markets, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
$93.19Financial Services
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$171.14Financial Services
Total return — HOOD vs MMC
growth of $100 · last 5yHOOD +148.6%MMC +16.6%HOOD compounded faster
HOOD MMC
HOOD vs MMC: by the numbers
- •MMC is the larger company ($89.82B vs $83.92B market cap).
- •MMC trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.30 vs 45.02 P/E).
- •HOOD converts more revenue to profit (41.12% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •HOOD grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.80% vs 9.28% CAGR).
- •MMC pays a dividend (2.10% yield) while HOOD does not currently pay one.
Which is better, HOOD or MMC?
Metric tally: HOOD 6 · MMC 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMMC(lower P/E)
GrowthHOOD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMMC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | HOOD | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.02 | 20.30● |
| Forward P/E | 36.66 | 16.60● |
| P/S ratio | 18.49 | 3.11● |
| P/B ratio | 9.15 | 5.48● |
| PEG ratio | 1.64● | 7.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | 42.11 | 14.59● |
| FCF yield | 2.53% | 5.96%● |
Profitability
| Metric | HOOD | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 82.27%● | 20.12% |
| Operating margin | 46.28%● | 21.70% |
| Net margin | 41.12%● | 14.26% |
| ROE | 20.36% | 26.51%● |
| ROIC | 7.55% | 12.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | HOOD | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.10% |
| Payout ratio | — | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HOOD | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 27.80%● | 9.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 262.28%● | 16.34% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.04% | 8.27%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | — | 10.12% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, HOOD or MMC?
- It depends on your goal. value: MMC (lower P/E); growth: HOOD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MMC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MMC leads 9 to 6.
- Is HOOD or MMC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MMC is cheaper: HOOD trades at a 45.02 P/E and MMC at 20.30.
- Which has grown faster, HOOD or MMC?
- Over the past five years, HOOD grew revenue faster — HOOD at a 27.80% CAGR versus MMC at 9.28%.
- Does HOOD or MMC pay a bigger dividend?
- MMC pays a dividend (2.10% yield) while HOOD does not currently pay one.
- Is HOOD or MMC more profitable?
- HOOD runs the higher net margin — HOOD at 41.12% versus MMC at 14.26%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Robinhood Markets P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioRobinhood Markets dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldRobinhood Markets ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROERobinhood Markets operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginRobinhood Markets revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthRobinhood Markets free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Robinhood Markets & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.