ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

GTM leads on 6 of 8 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare

Total return — GTM vs NA

growth of $100 · last 4y
GTM -92.2%NA -98.3%GTM compounded faster
050100150Start $1002023202420252026$8$2
GTM NA

GTM vs NA: by the numbers

  • GTM is the larger company ($818M vs $136M market cap).
  • GTM is profitable (10.10% net margin) while NA runs a net loss (-261.47%).
  • NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (63.97% vs 18.92% CAGR).

Which is better, GTM or NA?

Metric tally: GTM 6 · NA 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthNA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityGTM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricGTMNA
P/E ratio7.24
Forward P/E2.57
P/S ratio0.729.94
P/B ratio0.610.45
PEG ratio0.07
EV / EBITDA7.10
FCF yield41.67%

Profitability

MetricGTMNA
Gross margin84.21%49.25%
Operating margin19.40%-322.16%
Net margin10.10%-261.47%
ROE8.60%-8.22%
ROIC2.48%-10.96%

Growth (annualized)

MetricGTMNA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)18.92%63.97%
FCF CAGR (5Y)11.57%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-43.67%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GTM or NA?
It depends on your goal. growth: NA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GTM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GTM leads 6 to 2.
Which has grown faster, GTM or NA?
Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — GTM at a 18.92% CAGR versus NA at 63.97%.
Is GTM or NA more profitable?
GTM runs the higher net margin — GTM at 10.10% versus NA at -261.47%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.