Is GPS or RMBS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GPS is cheaper: GPS trades at a 9.98 P/E and RMBS at 69.79.

Which has grown faster, GPS or RMBS?

Over the past five years, RMBS grew revenue faster — GPS at a -0.36% CAGR versus RMBS at 23.51%.

Is GPS or RMBS more profitable?

RMBS runs the higher net margin — GPS at 6.25% versus RMBS at 31.89%.

Which has been the better investment, GPS or RMBS?

Over the past 10-year, RMBS delivered the higher annualized total return — GPS at -4.23% versus RMBS at 28.14%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Gap, Inc. (GPS) vs Rambus Inc. (RMBS)

GPS and RMBS are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of The Gap, Inc. and Rambus Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

GPS

The Gap, Inc.

$9.21B

$20.16Consumer Cyclical

Total return — GPS vs RMBS

growth of $100 · last 27y

GPS +111.8%RMBS +411.1%RMBS compounded faster

GPS RMBS

GPS vs RMBS: by the numbers

•RMBS is the larger company ($15.64B vs $9.21B market cap).
•GPS trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.98 vs 69.79 P/E).
•RMBS converts more revenue to profit (31.89% vs 6.25% net margin).
•RMBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.51% vs -0.36% CAGR).

Which is better, GPS or RMBS?

Metric tally: GPS 8 · RMBS 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGPS(lower P/E)

GrowthRMBS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityRMBS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GPS	RMBS
P/E ratio	9.98●	69.79
Forward P/E	10.47●	49.34
P/S ratio	0.51●	22.30
P/B ratio	2.66●	11.54
PEG ratio	0.14●	1.53
EV / EBITDA	7.18●	52.03
FCF yield	15.29%●	2.08%

Profitability

Metric	GPS	RMBS
Gross margin	40.50%	77.03%●
Operating margin	8.44%	35.89%●
Net margin	6.25%	31.89%●
ROE	26.32%●	16.51%
ROIC	8.06%	15.03%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GPS	RMBS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-0.36%	23.51%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.35%	48.76%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.60%	16.48%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.01%	48.04%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, GPS or RMBS?: It depends on your goal. value: GPS (lower P/E); growth: RMBS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: RMBS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is GPS or RMBS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GPS is cheaper: GPS trades at a 9.98 P/E and RMBS at 69.79.
Which has grown faster, GPS or RMBS?: Over the past five years, RMBS grew revenue faster — GPS at a -0.36% CAGR versus RMBS at 23.51%.
Is GPS or RMBS more profitable?: RMBS runs the higher net margin — GPS at 6.25% versus RMBS at 31.89%.
Which has been the better investment, GPS or RMBS?: Over the past 10-year, RMBS delivered the higher annualized total return — GPS at -4.23% versus RMBS at 28.14%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GPS analysis Full RMBS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Gap P/E ratio Rambus P/E ratio Gap dividend yield Rambus dividend yield Gap ROE Rambus ROE Gap operating margin Rambus operating margin Gap revenue growth Rambus revenue growth Gap free cash flow Rambus free cash flow

Gap & Rambus appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.