Which has grown faster, GPS or NIO?

Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — GPS at a -0.36% CAGR versus NIO at 33.07%.

Is GPS or NIO more profitable?

GPS runs the higher net margin — GPS at 6.25% versus NIO at -8.84%.

Which has been the better investment, GPS or NIO?

Over the past 5-year, GPS delivered the higher annualized total return — GPS at -4.23% versus NIO at -35.56%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Gap, Inc. (GPS) vs NIO Inc. (NIO)

GPS leads on 8 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The Gap, Inc. and NIO Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

GPS

The Gap, Inc.

$9.21B

$20.16Consumer Cyclical

NIO

NIO Inc.

$11.80B

$5.20Consumer Cyclical

Total return — GPS vs NIO

growth of $100 · last 6y

GPS -28.9%NIO -23.9%NIO compounded faster

GPS NIO

GPS vs NIO: by the numbers

•NIO is the larger company ($11.80B vs $9.21B market cap).
•GPS is profitable (6.25% net margin) while NIO runs a net loss (-8.84%).
•NIO grew revenue faster over the past five years (33.07% vs -0.36% CAGR).

Which is better, GPS or NIO?

Metric tally: GPS 8 · NIO 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthNIO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityGPS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GPS	NIO
P/E ratio	9.98	—
Forward P/E	10.47	8.56●
P/S ratio	0.51●	0.90
P/B ratio	2.66●	20.51
PEG ratio	0.14	—
EV / EBITDA	7.18	—
FCF yield	15.29%	—

Profitability

Metric	GPS	NIO
Gross margin	40.50%●	15.74%
Operating margin	8.44%●	-8.06%
Net margin	6.25%●	-8.84%
ROE	26.32%●	-200.85%
ROIC	8.06%●	-26.94%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GPS	NIO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-0.36%	33.07%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.35%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.60%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.01%●	-35.56%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GPS or NIO?: It depends on your goal. growth: NIO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GPS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GPS leads 8 to 2.
Which has grown faster, GPS or NIO?: Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — GPS at a -0.36% CAGR versus NIO at 33.07%.
Is GPS or NIO more profitable?: GPS runs the higher net margin — GPS at 6.25% versus NIO at -8.84%.
Which has been the better investment, GPS or NIO?: Over the past 5-year, GPS delivered the higher annualized total return — GPS at -4.23% versus NIO at -35.56%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GPS analysis Full NIO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Gap P/E ratio NIO P/E ratio Gap dividend yield NIO dividend yield Gap ROE NIO ROE Gap operating margin NIO operating margin Gap revenue growth NIO revenue growth Gap free cash flow NIO free cash flow

Gap & NIO appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.