Is GPS or NCLH cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GPS is cheaper: GPS trades at a 9.98 P/E and NCLH at 17.22.

Which has grown faster, GPS or NCLH?

Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — GPS at a -0.36% CAGR versus NCLH at 208.16%.

Is GPS or NCLH more profitable?

GPS runs the higher net margin — GPS at 6.25% versus NCLH at 5.66%.

Which has been the better investment, GPS or NCLH?

Over the past 10-year, GPS delivered the higher annualized total return — GPS at -4.23% versus NCLH at -7.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Gap, Inc. (GPS) vs Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH)

GPS leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The Gap, Inc. and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

GPS

The Gap, Inc.

$9.21B

$20.16Consumer Cyclical

NCLH

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

$9.38B

$20.44Consumer Cyclical

Total return — GPS vs NCLH

growth of $100 · last 12y

GPS -38.8%NCLH -20.0%NCLH compounded faster

GPS NCLH

GPS vs NCLH: by the numbers

•NCLH is the larger company ($9.38B vs $9.21B market cap).
•GPS trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.98 vs 17.22 P/E).
•GPS converts more revenue to profit (6.25% vs 5.66% net margin).
•NCLH grew revenue faster over the past five years (208.16% vs -0.36% CAGR).

Which is better, GPS or NCLH?

Metric tally: GPS 8 · NCLH 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGPS(lower P/E)

GrowthNCLH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityNCLH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GPS	NCLH
P/E ratio	9.98●	17.22
Forward P/E	10.47	10.13●
P/S ratio	0.51●	0.95
P/B ratio	2.66●	3.92
PEG ratio	0.14	—
EV / EBITDA	7.18●	10.29
FCF yield	15.29%	—

Profitability

Metric	GPS	NCLH
Gross margin	40.50%	43.05%●
Operating margin	8.44%	15.88%●
Net margin	6.25%●	5.66%
ROE	26.32%●	23.37%
ROIC	8.06%	8.75%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GPS	NCLH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-0.36%	208.16%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.35%●	-22.47%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.60%	35.22%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.01%●	-7.57%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GPS or NCLH?: It depends on your goal. value: GPS (lower P/E); growth: NCLH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NCLH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GPS leads 8 to 6.
Is GPS or NCLH cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GPS is cheaper: GPS trades at a 9.98 P/E and NCLH at 17.22.
Which has grown faster, GPS or NCLH?: Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — GPS at a -0.36% CAGR versus NCLH at 208.16%.
Is GPS or NCLH more profitable?: GPS runs the higher net margin — GPS at 6.25% versus NCLH at 5.66%.
Which has been the better investment, GPS or NCLH?: Over the past 10-year, GPS delivered the higher annualized total return — GPS at -4.23% versus NCLH at -7.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GPS analysis Full NCLH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Gap P/E ratio Norwegian Cruise Line P/E ratio Gap dividend yield Norwegian Cruise Line dividend yield Gap ROE Norwegian Cruise Line ROE Gap operating margin Norwegian Cruise Line operating margin Gap revenue growth Norwegian Cruise Line revenue growth Gap free cash flow Norwegian Cruise Line free cash flow

Gap & Norwegian Cruise Line appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.