Is GPS or MHK cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GPS is cheaper: GPS trades at a 9.98 P/E and MHK at 16.14.

Which has grown faster, GPS or MHK?

Over the past five years, MHK grew revenue faster — GPS at a -0.36% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.

Is GPS or MHK more profitable?

GPS runs the higher net margin — GPS at 6.25% versus MHK at 3.77%.

Which has been the better investment, GPS or MHK?

Over the past 10-year, GPS delivered the higher annualized total return — GPS at -4.23% versus MHK at -5.78%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Gap, Inc. (GPS) vs Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK)

GPS leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The Gap, Inc. and Mohawk Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

GPS

The Gap, Inc.

$9.21B

$20.16Consumer Cyclical

MHK

Mohawk Industries, Inc.

$6.56B

$107.64Consumer Cyclical

Total return — GPS vs MHK

growth of $100 · last 28y

GPS +103.8%MHK +1214.2%MHK compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GPS MHK

GPS vs MHK: by the numbers

•GPS is the larger company ($9.21B vs $6.56B market cap).
•GPS trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.98 vs 16.14 P/E).
•GPS converts more revenue to profit (6.25% vs 3.77% net margin).
•MHK grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.03% vs -0.36% CAGR).

Which is better, GPS or MHK?

Metric tally: GPS 12 · MHK 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGPS(lower P/E)

GrowthMHK(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityGPS(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	GPS	MHK
P/E ratio	9.98●	16.14
Forward P/E	10.47●	12.54
P/S ratio	0.51●	0.60
P/B ratio	2.66	0.79●
PEG ratio	0.14	—
EV / EBITDA	7.18	7.00●
FCF yield	15.29%●	10.68%

Profitability

Metric	GPS	MHK
Gross margin	40.50%●	24.34%
Operating margin	8.44%●	4.89%
Net margin	6.25%●	3.77%
ROE	26.32%●	4.95%
ROIC	8.06%●	3.54%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GPS	MHK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-0.36%	2.03%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.35%●	-3.82%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.60%●	-12.83%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.01%●	-11.03%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GPS or MHK?: It depends on your goal. value: GPS (lower P/E); growth: MHK (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GPS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GPS leads 12 to 3.
Is GPS or MHK cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GPS is cheaper: GPS trades at a 9.98 P/E and MHK at 16.14.
Which has grown faster, GPS or MHK?: Over the past five years, MHK grew revenue faster — GPS at a -0.36% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.
Is GPS or MHK more profitable?: GPS runs the higher net margin — GPS at 6.25% versus MHK at 3.77%.
Which has been the better investment, GPS or MHK?: Over the past 10-year, GPS delivered the higher annualized total return — GPS at -4.23% versus MHK at -5.78%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GPS analysis Full MHK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Gap P/E ratio Mohawk Industries P/E ratio Gap dividend yield Mohawk Industries dividend yield Gap ROE Mohawk Industries ROE Gap operating margin Mohawk Industries operating margin Gap revenue growth Mohawk Industries revenue growth Gap free cash flow Mohawk Industries free cash flow

Gap & Mohawk Industries appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.