Is GPS or KMX cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GPS is cheaper: GPS trades at a 9.98 P/E and KMX at 32.77.

Which has grown faster, GPS or KMX?

Over the past five years, KMX grew revenue faster — GPS at a -0.36% CAGR versus KMX at 2.39%.

Is GPS or KMX more profitable?

GPS runs the higher net margin — GPS at 6.25% versus KMX at 0.84%.

Which has been the better investment, GPS or KMX?

Over the past 10-year, KMX delivered the higher annualized total return — GPS at -4.23% versus KMX at 1.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Gap, Inc. (GPS) vs CarMax, Inc. (KMX)

GPS leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The Gap, Inc. and CarMax, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

GPS

The Gap, Inc.

$9.21B

$20.16Consumer Cyclical

KMX

CarMax, Inc.

$7.49B

$52.76Consumer Cyclical

Total return — GPS vs KMX

growth of $100 · last 28y

GPS +132.5%KMX +631.0%KMX compounded faster

GPS KMX

GPS vs KMX: by the numbers

•GPS is the larger company ($9.21B vs $7.49B market cap).
•GPS trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.98 vs 32.77 P/E).
•GPS converts more revenue to profit (6.25% vs 0.84% net margin).
•KMX grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.39% vs -0.36% CAGR).

Which is better, GPS or KMX?

Metric tally: GPS 10 · KMX 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGPS(lower P/E)

GrowthKMX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityGPS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GPS	KMX
P/E ratio	9.98●	32.77
Forward P/E	10.47●	19.58
P/S ratio	0.51	0.28●
P/B ratio	2.66	1.23●
PEG ratio	0.14	—
EV / EBITDA	7.39	—
FCF yield	15.29%●	13.26%

Profitability

Metric	GPS	KMX
Gross margin	40.50%●	10.24%
Operating margin	8.44%●	-1.85%
Net margin	6.25%●	0.84%
ROE	26.32%●	3.64%
ROIC	8.06%●	-1.10%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GPS	KMX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-0.36%	2.39%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.35%●	-18.18%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.60%	13.85%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.01%●	-16.16%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GPS or KMX?: It depends on your goal. value: GPS (lower P/E); growth: KMX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GPS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GPS leads 10 to 4.
Is GPS or KMX cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GPS is cheaper: GPS trades at a 9.98 P/E and KMX at 32.77.
Which has grown faster, GPS or KMX?: Over the past five years, KMX grew revenue faster — GPS at a -0.36% CAGR versus KMX at 2.39%.
Is GPS or KMX more profitable?: GPS runs the higher net margin — GPS at 6.25% versus KMX at 0.84%.
Which has been the better investment, GPS or KMX?: Over the past 10-year, KMX delivered the higher annualized total return — GPS at -4.23% versus KMX at 1.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GPS analysis Full KMX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Gap P/E ratio CarMax P/E ratio Gap dividend yield CarMax dividend yield Gap ROE CarMax ROE Gap operating margin CarMax operating margin Gap revenue growth CarMax revenue growth Gap free cash flow CarMax free cash flow

Gap & CarMax appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.