Genuine Parts Company (GPC) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)
LULU leads on 12 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Genuine Parts Company and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GPC
Genuine Parts Company
$116.02Consumer Cyclical
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
$117.57Consumer Cyclical
Total return — GPC vs LULU
growth of $100 · last 19yGPC +136.4%LULU +739.8%LULU compounded faster
GPC LULU
GPC vs LULU: by the numbers
- •GPC is the larger company ($16.14B vs $13.35B market cap).
- •LULU trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.52 vs 269.81 P/E).
- •LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 0.24% net margin).
- •LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 7.87% CAGR).
- •GPC pays a dividend (3.66% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
Which is better, GPC or LULU?
Metric tally: GPC 2 · LULU 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLULU(lower P/E)
GrowthLULU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityLULU(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GPC | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 269.81 | 9.52● |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.70 |
| P/S ratio | 0.65● | 1.21 |
| P/B ratio | 3.58 | 2.81● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.51 | 5.55● |
| FCF yield | 3.42% | 9.43%● |
Profitability
| Metric | GPC | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.17% | 55.70%● |
| Operating margin | 4.42% | 18.21%● |
| Net margin | 0.24% | 13.03%● |
| ROE | 1.34% | 30.25%● |
| ROIC | 9.87% | 22.70%● |
Dividends
| Metric | GPC | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.66% | — |
| Payout ratio | 904.26% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GPC | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.87% | 17.61%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -30.74% | 24.02%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -23.49% | 7.36%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.95%● | -20.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GPC or LULU?
- It depends on your goal. value: LULU (lower P/E); growth: LULU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 12 to 2.
- Is GPC or LULU cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: GPC trades at a 269.81 P/E and LULU at 9.52.
- Which has grown faster, GPC or LULU?
- Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — GPC at a 7.87% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.
- Does GPC or LULU pay a bigger dividend?
- GPC pays a dividend (3.66% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
- Is GPC or LULU more profitable?
- LULU runs the higher net margin — GPC at 0.24% versus LULU at 13.03%.
- Which has been the better investment, GPC or LULU?
- Over the past 10-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — GPC at 4.85% versus LULU at 5.38%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Genuine Parts P/E ratioLululemon Athletica P/E ratioGenuine Parts dividend yieldLululemon Athletica dividend yieldGenuine Parts ROELululemon Athletica ROEGenuine Parts operating marginLululemon Athletica operating marginGenuine Parts revenue growthLululemon Athletica revenue growthGenuine Parts free cash flowLululemon Athletica free cash flow
Genuine Parts & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.