Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)
SWK leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Generac Holdings Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GNRC
Generac Holdings Inc.
$262.36Industrials
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
$83.62Industrials
Total return — GNRC vs SWK
growth of $100 · last 16yGNRC +3001.0%SWK +54.5%GNRC compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
GNRC SWK
GNRC vs SWK: by the numbers
- •GNRC is the larger company ($15.44B vs $13.00B market cap).
- •SWK trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.27 vs 82.24 P/E).
- •GNRC converts more revenue to profit (4.37% vs 2.44% net margin).
- •GNRC grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.96% vs 0.68% CAGR).
- •SWK pays a dividend (3.97% yield) while GNRC does not currently pay one.
Which is better, GNRC or SWK?
Metric tally: GNRC 7 · SWK 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSWK(lower P/E)
GrowthGNRC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySWK(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | GNRC | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 82.24 | 34.27● |
| Forward P/E | 23.89 | 15.62● |
| P/S ratio | 3.59 | 0.84● |
| P/B ratio | 5.81 | 1.42● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.49 | 15.04● |
| FCF yield | 2.13% | 5.69%● |
Profitability
| Metric | GNRC | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.14%● | 30.03% |
| Operating margin | 7.46% | 7.79%● |
| Net margin | 4.37%● | 2.44% |
| ROE | 7.07%● | 4.13% |
| ROIC | 5.29% | 7.21%● |
Dividends
| Metric | GNRC | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 3.97% |
| Payout ratio | — | 125.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GNRC | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.96%● | 0.68% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -13.42%● | -19.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -9.70%● | -17.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -5.55%● | -13.22% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GNRC or SWK?
- It depends on your goal. value: SWK (lower P/E); growth: GNRC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SWK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SWK leads 8 to 7.
- Is GNRC or SWK cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SWK is cheaper: GNRC trades at a 82.24 P/E and SWK at 34.27.
- Which has grown faster, GNRC or SWK?
- Over the past five years, GNRC grew revenue faster — GNRC at a 8.96% CAGR versus SWK at 0.68%.
- Does GNRC or SWK pay a bigger dividend?
- SWK pays a dividend (3.97% yield) while GNRC does not currently pay one.
- Is GNRC or SWK more profitable?
- GNRC runs the higher net margin — GNRC at 4.37% versus SWK at 2.44%.
- Which has been the better investment, GNRC or SWK?
- Over the past 10-year, GNRC delivered the higher annualized total return — GNRC at 21.37% versus SWK at -0.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Generac P/E ratioStanley Black & Decker P/E ratioGenerac dividend yieldStanley Black & Decker dividend yieldGenerac ROEStanley Black & Decker ROEGenerac operating marginStanley Black & Decker operating marginGenerac revenue growthStanley Black & Decker revenue growthGenerac free cash flowStanley Black & Decker free cash flow
Generac & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.