Which has the lower trailing P/E, GNRC or SWK?

SWK has the lower trailing P/E: GNRC trades at 47.80 and SWK at 21.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GNRC or SWK?

Over the past five years, GNRC grew revenue faster — GNRC at a 6.83% CAGR versus SWK at -0.16%.

Does GNRC or SWK pay a bigger dividend?

SWK pays a dividend (3.73% yield), while GNRC is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is GNRC or SWK more profitable?

GNRC runs the higher net margin — GNRC at 5.82% versus SWK at 4.07%.

How have GNRC and SWK total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, GNRC delivered 18.50% and SWK delivered -0.20% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)

A side-by-side comparison of Generac Holdings Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GNRC

Generac Holdings Inc.

$12.21B

$207.44IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SWK

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

$13.53B

$89.58IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — GNRC vs SWK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

GNRC +434.7% (+18.3%/yr)SWK -4.5% (-0.5%/yr)GNRC compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GNRC SWK

GNRC vs SWK: by the numbers

•SWK is the larger company ($13.53B vs $12.21B market cap).
•SWK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.96 vs 47.80 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GNRC converts more revenue to profit (5.82% vs 4.07% net margin).
•GNRC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.83% vs -0.16% CAGR).
•SWK pays a dividend (3.73% yield), while GNRC is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GNRC	SWK
P/E ratio	47.80	21.96
Forward P/E	21.34	16.01
P/S ratio	2.75	0.89
P/B ratio	4.24	1.51
EV / EBITDA	N/A	10.17
FCF yield	3.11%	9.53%

Profitability

Metric	GNRC	SWK
Gross margin	39.54%	31.72%
Operating margin	9.50%	8.34%
Net margin	5.82%	4.07%
ROE	8.97%	6.93%
ROIC	6.95%	5.92%

Dividends

Metric	GNRC	SWK
Dividend yield	N/A	3.73%
Payout ratio	N/A	81.62%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GNRC	SWK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.83%	-0.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-13.42%	-19.52%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-7.45%	0.62%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-16.15%	-10.46%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GNRC or SWK?: SWK has the lower trailing P/E: GNRC trades at 47.80 and SWK at 21.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GNRC or SWK?: Over the past five years, GNRC grew revenue faster — GNRC at a 6.83% CAGR versus SWK at -0.16%.
Does GNRC or SWK pay a bigger dividend?: SWK pays a dividend (3.73% yield), while GNRC is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is GNRC or SWK more profitable?: GNRC runs the higher net margin — GNRC at 5.82% versus SWK at 4.07%.
How have GNRC and SWK total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, GNRC delivered 18.50% and SWK delivered -0.20% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GNRC analysis Full SWK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Generac P/E ratio Stanley Black & Decker P/E ratio Stanley Black & Decker dividend yield Generac ROE Stanley Black & Decker ROE Generac operating margin Stanley Black & Decker operating margin Generac revenue growth Stanley Black & Decker revenue growth Generac free cash flow Stanley Black & Decker free cash flow

Generac & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.