Is GLW or PANW cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GLW is cheaper: GLW trades at a 108.58 P/E and PANW at 254.86.

Which has grown faster, GLW or PANW?

Over the past five years, PANW grew revenue faster — GLW at a 5.99% CAGR versus PANW at 21.62%.

Does GLW or PANW pay a bigger dividend?

GLW pays a dividend (0.49% yield) while PANW does not currently pay one.

Is GLW or PANW more profitable?

GLW runs the higher net margin — GLW at 11.09% versus PANW at 7.95%.

Which has been the better investment, GLW or PANW?

Over the past 10-year, GLW delivered the higher annualized total return — GLW at 31.06% versus PANW at 30.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Corning Inc (GLW) vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW)

GLW leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Corning Inc and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

$199.74B

$293.09Technology

Total return — GLW vs PANW

growth of $100 · last 14y

GLW +1729.9%PANW +3211.8%PANW compounded faster

GLW PANW

GLW vs PANW: by the numbers

•PANW is the larger company ($199.74B vs $196.34B market cap).
•GLW trades at the lower earnings multiple (108.58 vs 254.86 P/E).
•GLW converts more revenue to profit (11.09% vs 7.95% net margin).
•PANW grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.62% vs 5.99% CAGR).
•GLW pays a dividend (0.49% yield) while PANW does not currently pay one.

Which is better, GLW or PANW?

Metric tally: GLW 9 · PANW 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGLW(lower P/E)

GrowthPANW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityGLW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GLW	PANW
P/E ratio	108.58●	254.86
Forward P/E	71.52	71.73
P/S ratio	12.05●	20.56
P/B ratio	16.65	7.88●
PEG ratio	0.22●	3.67
EV / EBITDA	54.05●	95.57
FCF yield	0.76%	1.97%●

Profitability

Metric	GLW	PANW
Gross margin	36.31%	71.94%●
Operating margin	15.31%●	9.65%
Net margin	11.09%●	7.95%
ROE	15.32%●	3.05%
ROIC	7.54%●	5.67%

Dividends

Metric	GLW	PANW
Dividend yield	0.49%	—
Payout ratio	60.22%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GLW	PANW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.99%	21.62%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.07%	69.46%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-0.45%	25.30%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	44.69%●	36.18%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GLW or PANW?: It depends on your goal. value: GLW (lower P/E); growth: PANW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GLW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GLW leads 9 to 6.
Is GLW or PANW cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GLW is cheaper: GLW trades at a 108.58 P/E and PANW at 254.86.
Which has grown faster, GLW or PANW?: Over the past five years, PANW grew revenue faster — GLW at a 5.99% CAGR versus PANW at 21.62%.
Does GLW or PANW pay a bigger dividend?: GLW pays a dividend (0.49% yield) while PANW does not currently pay one.
Is GLW or PANW more profitable?: GLW runs the higher net margin — GLW at 11.09% versus PANW at 7.95%.
Which has been the better investment, GLW or PANW?: Over the past 10-year, GLW delivered the higher annualized total return — GLW at 31.06% versus PANW at 30.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GLW analysis Full PANW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Corning P/E ratio Palo Alto Networks P/E ratio Corning dividend yield Palo Alto Networks dividend yield Corning ROE Palo Alto Networks ROE Corning operating margin Palo Alto Networks operating margin Corning revenue growth Palo Alto Networks revenue growth Corning free cash flow Palo Alto Networks free cash flow

Corning & Palo Alto Networks appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.