Corning Inc (GLW) vs Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL)
GLW leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though MRVL is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Corning Inc and Marvell Technology, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — GLW vs MRVL
growth of $100 · last 26yGLW +154.9%MRVL +1788.6%MRVL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
GLW MRVL
GLW vs MRVL: by the numbers
- •MRVL is the larger company ($234.12B vs $185.23B market cap).
- •MRVL trades at the lower earnings multiple (96.70 vs 108.58 P/E).
- •MRVL converts more revenue to profit (28.99% vs 11.09% net margin).
- •MRVL grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.90% vs 5.99% CAGR).
- •GLW pays the higher dividend yield (0.49% vs 0.09%).
Which is better, GLW or MRVL?
Metric tally: GLW 9 · MRVL 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMRVL(lower P/E)
GrowthMRVL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityGLW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GLW | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 108.58 | 96.70● |
| Forward P/E | 71.52 | 45.52● |
| P/S ratio | 12.05● | 28.82 |
| P/B ratio | 16.65 | 13.79● |
| PEG ratio | 0.22● | 21.49 |
| EV / EBITDA | 57.61● | 93.82 |
| FCF yield | 0.76%● | 0.66% |
Profitability
| Metric | GLW | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.31% | 50.64%● |
| Operating margin | 15.31% | 16.20%● |
| Net margin | 11.09% | 28.99%● |
| ROE | 15.32%● | 13.87% |
| ROIC | 7.54%● | 5.98% |
Dividends
| Metric | GLW | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.49%● | 0.09% |
| Payout ratio | 60.22% | 7.74% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GLW | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.99% | 22.90%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 28.07%● | 4.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.45% | 26.05%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 42.97%● | 37.08% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GLW or MRVL?
- It depends on your goal. value: MRVL (lower P/E); growth: MRVL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GLW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GLW leads 9 to 8.
- Is GLW or MRVL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MRVL is cheaper: GLW trades at a 108.58 P/E and MRVL at 96.70.
- Which has grown faster, GLW or MRVL?
- Over the past five years, MRVL grew revenue faster — GLW at a 5.99% CAGR versus MRVL at 22.90%.
- Does GLW or MRVL pay a bigger dividend?
- GLW yields 0.49% and MRVL yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GLW or MRVL more profitable?
- MRVL runs the higher net margin — GLW at 11.09% versus MRVL at 28.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, GLW or MRVL?
- Over the past 10-year, MRVL delivered the higher annualized total return — GLW at 30.28% versus MRVL at 40.22%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Corning P/E ratioMarvell Technology P/E ratioCorning dividend yieldMarvell Technology dividend yieldCorning ROEMarvell Technology ROECorning operating marginMarvell Technology operating marginCorning revenue growthMarvell Technology revenue growthCorning free cash flowMarvell Technology free cash flow
Corning & Marvell Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.