Is GIS or RL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GIS is cheaper: GIS trades at a 8.46 P/E and RL at 26.74.

Which has grown faster, GIS or RL?

Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — GIS at a 0.09% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.

Does GIS or RL pay a bigger dividend?

GIS yields 7.07% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GIS or RL more profitable?

GIS runs the higher net margin — GIS at 12.05% versus RL at 11.60%.

Which has been the better investment, GIS or RL?

Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — GIS at -2.68% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

General Mills, Inc. (GIS) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

GIS leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of General Mills, Inc. and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

GIS

General Mills, Inc.

$18.42B

$34.51Consumer Defensive

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$24.64B

$403.98Consumer Cyclical

Total return — GIS vs RL

growth of $100 · last 29y

GIS +112.8%RL +1182.5%RL compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GIS RL

GIS vs RL: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $18.42B market cap).
•GIS trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.46 vs 26.74 P/E).
•GIS converts more revenue to profit (12.05% vs 11.60% net margin).
•RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 0.09% CAGR).
•GIS pays the higher dividend yield (7.07% vs 0.90%).

Which is better, GIS or RL?

Metric tally: GIS 9 · RL 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGIS(lower P/E)

GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeGIS(higher dividend yield)

QualityRL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GIS	RL
P/E ratio	8.46●	26.74
Forward P/E	10.93●	22.03
P/S ratio	1.02●	3.10
P/B ratio	2.00●	8.86
PEG ratio	1.43	0.71●
EV / EBITDA	10.45●	22.22
FCF yield	8.81%●	2.96%

Profitability

Metric	GIS	RL
Gross margin	32.97%	69.87%●
Operating margin	19.07%●	14.53%
Net margin	12.05%●	11.60%
ROE	23.70%	33.13%●
ROIC	9.62%	19.62%●

Dividends

Metric	GIS	RL
Dividend yield	7.07%●	0.90%
Payout ratio	59.22%	23.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GIS	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.09%	13.01%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.92%	20.37%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-11.45%	22.25%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-7.83%	29.56%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, GIS or RL?: It depends on your goal. value: GIS (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GIS (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GIS leads 9 to 8.
Is GIS or RL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GIS is cheaper: GIS trades at a 8.46 P/E and RL at 26.74.
Which has grown faster, GIS or RL?: Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — GIS at a 0.09% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
Does GIS or RL pay a bigger dividend?: GIS yields 7.07% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GIS or RL more profitable?: GIS runs the higher net margin — GIS at 12.05% versus RL at 11.60%.
Which has been the better investment, GIS or RL?: Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — GIS at -2.68% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GIS analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

General Mills P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio General Mills dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield General Mills ROE Ralph Lauren ROE General Mills operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin General Mills revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth General Mills free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

General Mills & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.