General Mills, Inc. (GIS) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)
GIS leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of General Mills, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
$34.51Consumer Defensive
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$102.29Consumer Defensive
Total return — GIS vs KMB
growth of $100 · last 30yGIS +155.1%KMB +195.9%KMB compounded faster
GIS KMB
GIS vs KMB: by the numbers
- •KMB is the larger company ($33.95B vs $18.42B market cap).
- •GIS trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.46 vs 16.06 P/E).
- •KMB converts more revenue to profit (12.81% vs 12.05% net margin).
- •GIS grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.09% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •GIS pays the higher dividend yield (7.07% vs 4.97%).
Which is better, GIS or KMB?
Metric tally: GIS 10 · KMB 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGIS(lower P/E)
GrowthGIS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeGIS(higher dividend yield)
QualityKMB(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | GIS | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.46● | 16.06 |
| Forward P/E | 10.93● | 13.49 |
| P/S ratio | 1.02● | 2.06 |
| P/B ratio | 2.00● | 18.98 |
| PEG ratio | 1.43 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.45● | 13.26 |
| FCF yield | 8.81%● | 7.56% |
Profitability
| Metric | GIS | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 32.97% | 35.86%● |
| Operating margin | 19.07%● | 13.27% |
| Net margin | 12.05% | 12.81%● |
| ROE | 23.70% | 117.98%● |
| ROIC | 9.62% | 17.62%● |
Dividends
| Metric | GIS | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 7.07%● | 4.97% |
| Payout ratio | 59.22% | 83.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GIS | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.09%● | -2.61% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.92%● | -2.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -11.45% | 3.38%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -7.83% | -0.94%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GIS or KMB?
- It depends on your goal. value: GIS (lower P/E); growth: GIS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GIS (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GIS leads 10 to 6.
- Is GIS or KMB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GIS is cheaper: GIS trades at a 8.46 P/E and KMB at 16.06.
- Which has grown faster, GIS or KMB?
- Over the past five years, GIS grew revenue faster — GIS at a 0.09% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.
- Does GIS or KMB pay a bigger dividend?
- GIS yields 7.07% and KMB yields 4.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GIS or KMB more profitable?
- KMB runs the higher net margin — GIS at 12.05% versus KMB at 12.81%.
- Which has been the better investment, GIS or KMB?
- Over the past 10-year, KMB delivered the higher annualized total return — GIS at -2.68% versus KMB at 1.05%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
General Mills P/E ratioKimberly-Clark P/E ratioGeneral Mills dividend yieldKimberly-Clark dividend yieldGeneral Mills ROEKimberly-Clark ROEGeneral Mills operating marginKimberly-Clark operating marginGeneral Mills revenue growthKimberly-Clark revenue growthGeneral Mills free cash flowKimberly-Clark free cash flow
General Mills & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.