GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs Block, Inc. (SQ)
SQ leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Block, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — GFS vs SQ
growth of $100 · last 3yGFS -10.2%SQ -66.1%GFS compounded faster
GFS SQ
GFS vs SQ: by the numbers
- •SQ is the larger company ($51.73B vs $44.63B market cap).
- •SQ trades at the lower earnings multiple (49.81 vs 58.55 P/E).
- •GFS is profitable (11.37% net margin) while SQ runs a net loss (-2.04%).
- •SQ grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.19% vs 6.81% CAGR).
- •GFS pays a dividend (0.15% yield) while SQ does not currently pay one.
Which is better, GFS or SQ?
Metric tally: GFS 6 · SQ 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSQ(lower P/E)
GrowthSQ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityGFS(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | GFS | SQ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 58.55 | 49.81● |
| Forward P/E | 42.97 | 15.90● |
| P/S ratio | 6.67 | 2.35● |
| P/B ratio | 3.90 | 2.82● |
| PEG ratio | — | 696.22 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.82● | 26.61 |
| FCF yield | 2.35%● | 1.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | GFS | SQ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 26.40% | 44.85%● |
| Operating margin | 12.08%● | 4.93% |
| Net margin | 11.37%● | -2.04% |
| ROE | 6.65%● | -2.30% |
| ROIC | 5.23%● | -12.82% |
Dividends
| Metric | GFS | SQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.15% | — |
| Payout ratio | 7.55% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GFS | SQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.81% | 13.19%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 34.72% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 45.78% | 64.00%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | — | 4.50% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GFS or SQ?
- It depends on your goal. value: SQ (lower P/E); growth: SQ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GFS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SQ leads 7 to 6.
- Is GFS or SQ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SQ is cheaper: GFS trades at a 58.55 P/E and SQ at 49.81.
- Which has grown faster, GFS or SQ?
- Over the past five years, SQ grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus SQ at 13.19%.
- Does GFS or SQ pay a bigger dividend?
- GFS pays a dividend (0.15% yield) while SQ does not currently pay one.
- Is GFS or SQ more profitable?
- GFS runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus SQ at -2.04%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.