Is GFS or ROP cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ROP is cheaper: GFS trades at a 55.56 P/E and ROP at 22.15.

Which has grown faster, GFS or ROP?

Over the past five years, ROP grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus ROP at 9.25%.

Does GFS or ROP pay a bigger dividend?

GFS yields 0.16% and ROP yields 1.03% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GFS or ROP more profitable?

ROP runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus ROP at 21.12%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)

ROP leads on 13 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Roper Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 2, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Roper Technologies, Inc.

$36.75B

$364.20Technology

Total return — GFS vs ROP

growth of $100 · last 5y

GFS +49.1%ROP -24.2%GFS compounded faster

GFS ROP

GFS vs ROP: by the numbers

•GFS is the larger company ($38.32B vs $36.75B market cap).
•ROP trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.15 vs 55.56 P/E).
•ROP converts more revenue to profit (21.12% vs 11.37% net margin).
•ROP grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.25% vs 6.81% CAGR).
•ROP pays the higher dividend yield (1.03% vs 0.16%).

Which is better, GFS or ROP?

Metric tally: GFS 1 · ROP 13

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueROP(lower P/E)

GrowthROP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeROP(higher dividend yield)

QualityROP(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GFS	ROP
P/E ratio	55.56	22.15●
Forward P/E	40.80	16.19●
P/S ratio	6.33	4.57●
P/B ratio	3.71	1.97●
PEG ratio	—	2.32
EV / EBITDA	20.46	13.88●
FCF yield	2.48%	6.88%●

Profitability

Metric	GFS	ROP
Gross margin	26.40%	69.40%●
Operating margin	12.08%	28.09%●
Net margin	11.37%	21.12%●
ROE	6.65%	9.11%●
ROIC	5.20%	5.62%●

Dividends

Metric	GFS	ROP
Dividend yield	0.16%	1.03%●
Payout ratio	7.55%	25.44%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GFS	ROP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.81%	9.25%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	9.53%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	45.78%●	8.90%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	—	-4.47%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GFS or ROP?: It depends on your goal. value: ROP (lower P/E); growth: ROP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ROP (higher dividend yield); quality: ROP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ROP leads 13 to 1.
Is GFS or ROP cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ROP is cheaper: GFS trades at a 55.56 P/E and ROP at 22.15.
Which has grown faster, GFS or ROP?: Over the past five years, ROP grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus ROP at 9.25%.
Does GFS or ROP pay a bigger dividend?: GFS yields 0.16% and ROP yields 1.03% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GFS or ROP more profitable?: ROP runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus ROP at 21.12%.

Go deeper

Full GFS analysis Full ROP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

GLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratio Roper Technologies P/E ratio GLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yield Roper Technologies dividend yield GLOBALFOUNDRIES ROE Roper Technologies ROE GLOBALFOUNDRIES operating margin Roper Technologies operating margin GLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growth Roper Technologies revenue growth GLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow Roper Technologies free cash flow

GLOBALFOUNDRIES & Roper Technologies appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 2, 2026.