GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs Everpure, Inc (PSTG)
GFS leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Everpure, Inc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
$53.53TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PSTG
Everpure, Inc
$74.61TechnologyAt close: Jun 18, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — GFS vs PSTG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5yGFS +73.8%PSTG +177.7%PSTG compounded faster
GFS PSTG
GFS vs PSTG: by the numbers
- •GFS is the larger company ($29.37B vs $28.49B market cap).
- •GFS trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.94 vs 113.05 P/E).
- •GFS converts more revenue to profit (11.37% vs 5.75% net margin).
- •PSTG grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.87% vs 6.81% CAGR).
- •GFS pays a dividend (0.21% yield) while PSTG does not currently pay one.
Which is better, GFS or PSTG?
Metric tally: GFS 10 · PSTG 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGFS(lower P/E)
GrowthPSTG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityGFS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GFS | PSTG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.94● | 113.05 |
| Forward P/E | 30.05● | 38.34 |
| P/S ratio | 4.67● | 6.51 |
| P/B ratio | 2.73● | 17.77 |
| PEG ratio | — | 2.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.06● | 78.15 |
| FCF yield | 3.36%● | 0.61% |
Profitability
| Metric | GFS | PSTG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 26.40% | 70.23%● |
| Operating margin | 12.08%● | 4.21% |
| Net margin | 11.37%● | 5.75% |
| ROE | 6.65% | 15.69%● |
| ROIC | 5.20%● | 3.43% |
Dividends
| Metric | GFS | PSTG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | — |
| Payout ratio | 7.55% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GFS | PSTG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.81% | 17.87%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 45.78%● | 15.82% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | — | 31.59% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GFS or PSTG?
- It depends on your goal. value: GFS (lower P/E); growth: PSTG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GFS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GFS leads 10 to 3.
- Is GFS or PSTG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GFS is cheaper: GFS trades at a 40.94 P/E and PSTG at 113.05.
- Which has grown faster, GFS or PSTG?
- Over the past five years, PSTG grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus PSTG at 17.87%.
- Does GFS or PSTG pay a bigger dividend?
- GFS pays a dividend (0.21% yield) while PSTG does not currently pay one.
- Is GFS or PSTG more profitable?
- GFS runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus PSTG at 5.75%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
GLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratioEverpure P/E ratioGLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yieldEverpure dividend yieldGLOBALFOUNDRIES ROEEverpure ROEGLOBALFOUNDRIES operating marginEverpure operating marginGLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growthEverpure revenue growthGLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flowEverpure free cash flow
GLOBALFOUNDRIES & Everpure appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 24, 2026.