Is GFS or NTAP cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NTAP is cheaper: GFS trades at a 48.90 P/E and NTAP at 26.01.

Which has grown faster, GFS or NTAP?

Over the past five years, GFS grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.18%.

Does GFS or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?

GFS yields 0.18% and NTAP yields 1.26% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GFS or NTAP more profitable?

NTAP runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus NTAP at 18.43%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs NetApp, Inc. (NTAP)

NTAP leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and NetApp, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — GFS vs NTAP

growth of $100 · last 5y

GFS +46.5%NTAP +87.1%NTAP compounded faster

GFS NTAP

GFS vs NTAP: by the numbers

•GFS is the larger company ($38.25B vs $33.65B market cap).
•NTAP trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.01 vs 48.90 P/E).
•NTAP converts more revenue to profit (18.43% vs 11.37% net margin).
•GFS grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.81% vs 4.18% CAGR).
•NTAP pays the higher dividend yield (1.26% vs 0.18%).

Which is better, GFS or NTAP?

Metric tally: GFS 3 · NTAP 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNTAP(lower P/E)

GrowthGFS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeNTAP(higher dividend yield)

QualityNTAP(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GFS	NTAP
P/E ratio	48.90	26.01●
Forward P/E	35.91	20.72●
P/S ratio	5.57	4.75●
P/B ratio	3.26●	24.36
PEG ratio	—	1.58
EV / EBITDA	18.00	17.96
FCF yield	2.82%	5.68%●

Profitability

Metric	GFS	NTAP
Gross margin	26.40%	70.74%●
Operating margin	12.08%	24.12%●
Net margin	11.37%	18.43%●
ROE	6.65%	94.45%●
ROIC	5.20%	19.40%●

Dividends

Metric	GFS	NTAP
Dividend yield	0.18%	1.26%●
Payout ratio	7.55%	32.35%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GFS	NTAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.81%●	4.18%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	10.39%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	45.78%●	12.50%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	—	17.75%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GFS or NTAP?: It depends on your goal. value: NTAP (lower P/E); growth: GFS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTAP (higher dividend yield); quality: NTAP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTAP leads 10 to 3.
Is GFS or NTAP cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NTAP is cheaper: GFS trades at a 48.90 P/E and NTAP at 26.01.
Which has grown faster, GFS or NTAP?: Over the past five years, GFS grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.18%.
Does GFS or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?: GFS yields 0.18% and NTAP yields 1.26% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GFS or NTAP more profitable?: NTAP runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus NTAP at 18.43%.

Go deeper

Full GFS analysis Full NTAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

GLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratio NetApp P/E ratio GLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yield NetApp dividend yield GLOBALFOUNDRIES ROE NetApp ROE GLOBALFOUNDRIES operating margin NetApp operating margin GLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growth NetApp revenue growth GLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow NetApp free cash flow

GLOBALFOUNDRIES & NetApp appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.